Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience.
With the development of Web, advertisement and entertainment, some people think that stars and entertainers are playing a more important role in our life while others believe that scientists are much more significant in society progress. In my opinion, both of them have different importance in different aspects of our life while the scientists are more vitally important in human race.
On the one hand, people's daily are materially abundant in most of the cities. Entertainers, especially singers, actors and web celebrity are having more opportunities to show off and exposed in public. The shows, movies and advertisements made by the entertainers bring us colorful life and multiple choices to enjoy our daily spare time. Some entertainers even become models of youngsters. They are the guideline for teenagers in the aspect of career choices, way of dressing and lifestyle, etc.
On the other hand, scientists play a magnificent role in human being's development all the time. The innovation of Wi-Fi, the shoot of satellite, the new medicine of cancer, etc, all these invention by scientists directly influences the progress of the whole society. Thanks to the scientists who always work in the labs, can we human communicate easier, fly further, see deeper and live longer.
In conclusion, we need entertainers and celebrities to bring more happiness and joys in our daily life. Without them, life will be much more boring. However, we desperately need scientists to improve the life quality overall in different aspect. Scientists are irreplaceable in the the human history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | cocosasia | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | Gurpreet1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Anastasiya Chernigovskaya | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 56
- Nowadays people make new friends through social network and internet chat groups Some people think this is good Others think that face to face interaction is essential Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities or towns only old people live in the countryside What are the problems of this issue What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 56
- Some people say that it is individual responsibility to protect the environment while others say it is the government s primary role Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ntists play a magnificent role in human beings development all the time. The innovatio...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'these inventions'?
Suggestion: this invention; these inventions
...e, the new medicine of cancer, etc, all these invention by scientists directly influences the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ress of the whole society. Thanks to the scientists who always work in the labs, ...
^^^
Line 13, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...aspect. Scientists are irreplaceable in the the human history.
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 279, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...aspect. Scientists are irreplaceable in the the human history.
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect. Scientists are irreplaceable in the the human history.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02378608915 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8839469495 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125876469764 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435486881725 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571027871044 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796793642813 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683217277462 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.