Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities. Others, however, think that horizontal cities are better for living and working.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that living in a horizontal city is best, while some oppose this idea and prefer to live in a vertical city. Despite the fact that people living in horizontal cities may get some benefits, I would like to argue that cities with high rise buildings will be more beneficial to dwellers.
On the one hand, people may get more benefits in their financial and security affairs from Horizontal cities. For instant, they need not spend more money on amenities maintenance, which would be huge in cities with skyscrapers. Also living in low-rise buildings would be safer than living in high rise buildings. To explain, if a fire accident occurs it would be easy to escape from the dangerous place because the building is not too high off, it doesn’t take much time to get out of it.
On the other hand, it seems to me that living in a high rise building would be the best choice for the citizens. The important thing is that city with high-rise buildings occupies less space so that each skyscraper will get occupied by more dwellers. Because of this less amount of space will be utilized. The government can use these spaces to establish public parks, schools, and hospitals which would give more reimbursements to the urban people. Also, it is much convenient for people living in high rise buildings with good facilities and services such that shopping malls and services center on the ground floor.
To sum up, though there are some benefits to living in horizontal cities, demerits are dominating the benefits in these cities. Living in a Vertical city would be more convenient and give more benefits to the dwellers in my point of view.
- television dominates the free time for too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socializing with others Do you agree or disagree Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment To what extent do 78
- Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment To what extent do 78
- Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs will be more beneficial to dwellers. On the one hand, people may get more ben...
^^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'amenities'' or 'amenity's'?
Suggestion: amenities'; amenity's
...tant, they need not spend more money on amenities maintenance, which would be huge in cit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...uld be huge in cities with skyscrapers. Also living in low-rise buildings would be s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79094076655 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49451558825 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505226480836 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9119988889 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227811048047 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978419724479 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877765675702 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176514649341 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915983941829 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.