Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically progressive while having a clean environment at the same time. Some people disagree with this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Some people argue that the economic situation of the country can be improved while maintaining the cleanliness of the environment, however, others refute this point of view. Although the cleanliness of environment can be compromised in the race of economic progression, this essay believes that economic development can be achieved along with a cleaner environment.
On the one hand, it is imperative that economic progression can only be possible with the development of factories. The wastage produced from these factories affects the environment in the form of air pollution generated while production activities are undertaken. Moreover, a manufacturing factory generates a lot of waste products considered as leftovers from the production. These are not recycled and affects the cleanliness of the environment. A recent study in “Times Newspaper” reported that the pollution as well as leftovers caused by factories contribute as much as 50% on the overall environment. However, this essay believes that economic progression can be achieved along with a cleaner environment.
On the other hand, it is believed that stringent policies on economic activities which affect the environment can lead to a cleaner and greener environment. This means that the government can implement policies on cleanliness for factories. For example, a policy which specifies that a certain level of production can be done in a particular period and all the waste materials will be recycled. Moreover, the government can also implement policies for planting trees which can combat air pollution. In this way, the economic activities can be carried out while maintaining the environment.
In conclusion, although economic activities are detrimental to environment, it is clear that with the implementation government policies, this can be controlled and economic progression can go along with a cleaner environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-10 | Sarmad Gul | 73 | view |
- Some people say it is OK to use animal for our benefit, other say it is not good to exploit them. Discuss both point of view and give your opinion. 61
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences 65
- Most countries allow 18 years old to start driving a car Some say it is good to allow it at this age while other think that the age to start driving should be at least 25 Discuss both sides and give your opinion 74
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically progressive while having a clean environment at the same time. Some people disagree with this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an go along with a cleaner environment.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33228426779 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440972222222 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7131185652 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215758932343 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913459450896 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759031721604 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15780919921 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636826627297 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.