Some people believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe the government should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet
It is imperative to take good care of our health in order to avoid unfavorable health conditions. However, one decision the people are grappling with is: Should the government account for the health and diet of the people or the individual should take the responsibility ? In this essay, I will discuss both views, but because of the multitude health requirements associated with unique individuals, I believe the people should be responsible.
Owing to the fact that the government has lawful authority, and can therefore, enact regulations to control the food market, some people believe the government should take responsibility of the health and diet. They claim that the government can easily approve or disapprove vendors, and perhaps, restrict substandard food from hitting the market for consumption purpose. Advocates of this view also cite the use of publications and advertisement by the government as ways that could facilitate awareness and guidance of the public towards appropriate food intake, given all the media and power within its jurisdiction.
But, mostly, never do they know that there are wide varieties of health problems relating to numerous individuals, and as a result, the government may not have the in-depth knowledge and prevention measures of each ones. I believe most individuals tend to understand their health conditions better, as opposed the government's advice which might be based on general knowledge, although it might be effective to some extent. Not only do the people usually know what type of food to eat, but also the length of rest to take, depending on the individual's allergies.
The environment is another reason why people should take responsibility. Little can the government do about the individuals' surrounding, which may be the cause of deteriorating health, for it is quite quickly cleaned if it is duty of the people.
In conclusion, although the government has the central power to control the market in order to ensure healthy food in the circulation, the people often have accurate knowledge of their health, food and environment better than the government. Therefore, I am convinced that the individuals should take care of their own health and diet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | adeagboridwan | 73 | view |
- Shopping is now common in many countriesWhy is this the caseIs a positive of negative development 78
- In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read ebooks rather than paper books.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organisation To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.(opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the worldDo you think this is a positive or negative development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ealth conditions better, as opposed the governments advice which might be based on general ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31444759207 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01880537069 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526912181303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0794944131 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.307692308 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39635121671 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147622335637 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109584348442 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223010888737 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852336692659 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.