Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The preservation of cultural diversity in world is a controversial issue. It is argued by some politicians that cultures in certain regions should be unreachable for tourists. However, others disagree and claim that it is unattainable ambition. In this essay, I agree with the opinion that any limits on tourist is unpractical.
To begin with, some politicians argue that tourist access to separate region carrying cultural value should be withdrawn. The first reason is the gradual refusal to follow indigenous traditions by locals. Many young people, who learn the benefits of globalization, stop maintaining traditions of their ancestors. Another reason why these politicians advocate their opinion is frequent usage of foreign words by aborigines. Local people tend to replace some words in their mother tongue by nonnative words. The last argument is popularity of international customs in these regions. Many nations have been celebrating, for example, Halloween since first tourists showed them in the past.
However, other politicians argue that international influence is unstoppable and disadvantageous. They justify their point of view by the fact that widespread languages improves international communication. Languages, such as English, helps people to avoid cultural misunderstanding in these areas. In addition, there are other sources of changes in local cultures. For example, people often watch TV, listen to the radio and use the Internet, which makes any cultural limits useless. Moreover, tourism promotes human rights in isolated regions. Tourists often show local people how other people live in democratic countries, which helps to eliminate injustice, for instance, towards women.
In conclusion, even though these reasons for making places of cultural interests inaccessible to tourists sound serious, I think that any restrictions are unreasonable in modern interconnected world. In fact, it is mutually beneficial for different nations to continue cultural exchange.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-06 | vikrampreet SINGH | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-15 | Emjay | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | shaily | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | nazirsumara | 84 | view |
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments How far do you agree 84
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 73
- Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you a 84
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79661016949 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10954087768 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8970467844 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13888604476 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040923444888 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422049995569 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793403557041 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379377684095 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.