Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults.
Why do you think the Internet is dangerous in this way and what can we do to ensure that it does not harm the social development of teenagers and young adults?
A recent survey has shown that maximum usage of the internet is by the younger generation. It offers many benefits in terms of providing information and enhancing communication. Undoubtedly, the web is a proud technology for the modern world, but few people argue that it is harming the social skills of the youngsters. This essay will outline the side effects of the internet and the solutions to deal with it.
Exposure to the internet is affecting the social development of teenagers. Most of them are having access to the computer and mobile phones to use the internet. It is in isolation, which leaves less time for interaction with the family or friends. The personal interactions are done digitally rather than face to face. It has adversely affected the social and emotional bonding between the family members. Parents should pay more attention to get access to the internet and restricted hours should be practiced at home. It will help in allocating dedicated time for family members to interact with each other, keeping away their digital devices.
The Internet provides access to harmful online material which is not suitable for the younger age. For example, the Internet is full of pornographic websites which are not controlled and impact the psychological development of the youth. The parental control should be placed on electronic devices to ensure kids does not get exposed to harmful material.
Advancement of internet technology has changed the meaning of competition for youngsters. Their world consists of online gaming portals, which means no public speaking and outdoor activities. They feel more comfortable to participate in online games under an anonymous id instead of attending a public debate. This behaviour affects the overall personality development. To eradicate this behaviour, school and parents should engage youngsters in outdoor activities and public speaking forums. The outdoor activities will also lead the young generations towards a healthy lifestyle.
To conclude, the Internet is an essential resource, but we cannot ignore the side effects of technology. Parents and school should put an appropriate measure to ensure the development of the young generation is not affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | monika.ahuja2009@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | monika.ahuja2009@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | monika.ahuja2009@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | monika.ahuja2009@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 61
- Many doctors say that people in today s world do not do enough physical exercise What do you think are the causes of this What solutions are there to this problem 80
- These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults.Why do you think the Internet is dangerous in this way and what can we do to ensure that it does not harm the social development of teenagers a 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88486550459 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1550748068 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 7.06120827912 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210821420482 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607298638153 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511677553756 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118536187092 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375393961843 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.