Some people support agricultural developments, such as factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Since the last few decades, world population has been growing drastically and there is an urgent need to address an excess food requirement for this growth. One school of thought believes that scientific methodologies need to be used in the agricultural segment to accomplish extra food need. Another view is that farming under controlled environment is not needed and not healthy for human beings. Personally, I support those who believe, involving science is the need of the hour to make the progress in the agricultural domain.
To begin with, we need to understand the need for scientific innovations in the agricultural domain. Plenty of surveys have disclosed the fact that the overall population of the world is growing faster as the birth rate has increased and mortality rate has decreased. It means that the advancement in farming is very much essential to meet the excess need of food for such a growing population. Factory farming and various breeds of fruits and vegetables give more production in minimal time and within a small area. Moreover, these resources are enriched with minerals and vitamins as they are passed through standard healthy food criteria. In addition to this, global climate is unpredictable day by day. Here, science can help the farming segment by suggesting crops which can flourish in specific weather condition and more productive. Overall, scientific creation in agriculture developments is vital in accomplishing the need of the growing population.
On the other hand, there is another group of people who believe that controlled farming is not necessary. They also argue that scientific farming might degrade the quality of food as they do not grow naturally. Firstly, despite using an agricultural land for the industrial growth, factory farming and vegetable farming in a natural way can give more production. In fact, it can produce better than what was expected. Secondly, natural soil fertilizers from animals are easily available to produce organic crops with an excellent quality. It means agricultural progress in a natural environment is better than applying any scientific method.
In the light of the above discussion, as the number of consumers is increasing, growth in the agricultural domain is crucial to meet excess food requirement of the world. Many times nature does not support to take more production from a large land piece and might be a great failure as it cannot fulfill extra food demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-20 | ManishaDahatonde | 73 | view |
| 2017-12-20 | ManishaDahatonde | 73 | view |
- Some people say it is OK to use animals for our benefit others say it is not good to exploit them Discuss both points of view and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view. 93
- Development in technology make our life complex, and we should try to simplify our life and stay away from these development. To what extend do you agree? 96
- Some people say that traveling abroad is the way to really learn about another country. However, other people say that it is not necessary to travel as we can find enough information about other countries on the TV or through the internet. Discuss both vi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a natural way" with adverb for "natural"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., factory farming and vegetable farming in a natural way can give more production. In fact, it c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...ess food requirement of the world. Many times nature does not support to take more pr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23484848485 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86886803205 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3613266049 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.65 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177345741334 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053290978469 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418074991778 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100102105615 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400267256985 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.