Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often claimed that state authorities should make efforts to preserve less spoken languages whilst others argue that this phenomenon often leads to wastage of money. While focusing on global languages help economies to progress faster, I believe that governments should invest funds for saving endangered languages because they play a vital role in cultural development.
Many opposes the funding of local languages because they can never replace global languages. That is to say, with rapid globalization, people are alleviated towards global languages because it helps them to connect to myriad population with any language barrier. As a result, languages that tend to loose communicative purpose should not be subsidized in order to avoid language based misunderstanding. For example, although there are 28 regional languages in India, English and Hindi are considered as most effective languages to communicate in different organizations. However, in order to promote consumerism, it is crucial for corporation to cater services in all languages.
On the other hand, many regions reflect their culture through native language. Replacement of these would certainly have an adverse impact on the local culture. To substantiate, taking potential steps for minority languages not only help young generation to acquire historical knowledge but also help them to stay connected with their cultural roots. Eventually, promoting these linguistic capabilities is beneficial for the holistic development of children. For instance, recently the United Nations has started a new campaign ‘Our Language, Our Culture, which aimed at promoting more than 250 least spoken languages across the world. Therefore, I believe that preserving local languages is beneficial for for promoting the authentic culture.
In conclusion, although the languages in demand tend to be advantageous for economic growth, I believe that the better understanding of historical culture can only be attained through regional language and it help future generation to inculcate cultural values.
- Some people believe that educational qualifications always bring success while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 88
- Your company introduced a work uniform that you are mostly happy with except for one thing Write a letter to your manager and include the following What do you like about the uniform What don t you like about the uniform Make suggestions how to improve th 63
- You recently won a photography competition and your photo is going to be shown in an exhibition Invite your friend for the exhibition Please describe Competition and prize About the photograph Invite your friend 89
- More and more young children have mobile phones Some people say it is a good thing for them while others say it is a bad thing What is your opinion 89
- You have recently noticed an increase in traffic in your residential area Write a letter to the responsible person at the local council to inform him her about the problem and say Introduce yourself and describe the problem What are the reasons for the tr 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...er. As a result, languages that tend to loose communicative purpose should not be sub...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...reserving local languages is beneficial for for promoting the authentic culture. In ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...tained through regional language and it help future generation to inculcate cultural...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77198697068 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01673335138 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609120521173 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6742643086 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117762858345 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433152304397 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374002484579 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079701190882 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459605512925 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.