Some people think that school children should be asked to work individually in class. Others believe that working in small groups is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Educators always try to update the curriculum to help students perform better. It is often argued by some that working alone can be more beneficial as students can learn to be self-sufficient. Meanwhile, others still claim that working in a team can help achieve more, as students can solve complex problems with collective efforts. This essay will discuss both views before deducing a logical opinion.
On the one hand, the supporters of the idea that students should do tasks alone believe that it will help students to be less dependent and more confident so they can perform better in their studies by themselves. Take an example of a report published by a newspaper in the United Kingdom, which states that students who were used to study on an individual basis performed better in studies. Thus, encouraging students to do independent tasks can be more beneficial and make them self-sufficient.
While on the other hand, the advocates of the view that teamwork should be promoted to believe that working together will develop a sense of cooperation and collaboration, which can help them to accomplish difficult tasks easily. For instance, schools in China push children to work together in mini-groups to achieve better results. Hence, teamwork can be very useful for students.
Whereas, I believe that Teachers should develop activities in such a way that students have to work equally in a group and also require to perform some individual tasks. Working together can teach them teamwork skills and how to cooperate with others. While working alone will make them strong to do things independently.
To sum up, I firmly believe that children should be taught to work alone and as part of a group so they can learn to be self-sufficient and how to do things together as a team.
- Some people think that school children should be asked to work individually in class Others believe that working in small groups is better Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life What are the possible causes of this rapid change How can people prepare for work in the future 73
- In the past people wore clothes that were unique to their own culture Today people all over the world wear the same types of clothes Is this trend a positive or negative development 56
- 1 The number of people interested in cosmetic surgery is increasing in order to improve their physical appearance Why do people do operations to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
...ork equally in a group and also require to perform some individual tasks. Working together...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...kills and how to cooperate with others. While working alone will make them strong to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, still, thus, whereas, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02006688963 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82814237261 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498327759197 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6704956115 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276644365504 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105398067564 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630936134936 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175270149755 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505384298432 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.