Some think that all entertainment TV programmes should educate people about the importance of social issues To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some think that all entertainment TV programmes should educate people
about the importance of social issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree??

Television is the most popular form of entertainment for most people. Therefore, it is sensible why some suggested that education about social issues should be the main purpose of broadcasting TV programs. Personally, I believe this practice would unlikely work.
On one hand, gameshows and programs could convey meaningful messages about the world’s problems to their mass audience. First and foremost, every household owns at least one or more TV, thus making shows on television the most effective way to reach people. For example, during the pandemic, the Vietnamese Government raise citizens’ awareness through daily news programs and announce new policy about the lockdown. In addition, despite the rising of global problems, there were few programs which talk about it. Therefore, the overall awareness of people about the alarming stage of the world is relatively low.
Notwithstanding these reasons, I contend that replacing entertainment programs with educational ones would be ineffective. The most obvious reason is that these entertainment shows are a tool for people to release stress after a long, grueling working day. As a result, the audience would be weighed down by information about issues, such as global warming or war. Contracting to their original intention of watching TV which is to get rid of stress, more stress could be added rather than being eliminated. Even worse, some viewed might feel irritated and have a hostile attitude to educational programs, thus makes all the effort counterproductive.
In sum, despite the good intention of broadcasting shows that educate people, I believe that these programs should be a segment rather than be the only genre on TV. Greater emphasis should be placed on educational programs in order to impart knowledge about global issues.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-16 LEEANHTUAN 78 view
Essays by user LEEANHTUAN :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in addition, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40282685512 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91474672653 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6163618442 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188742890461 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640815743062 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582710946849 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126073867549 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422133833205 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.