Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion
It is a fact that several international players, who are famous in some sports, have a very high income. There is a school of thought who believes that the current high match fees that players are getting is not reasonable. However, others believe that famous players are earning because of their exceptional efforts and hard work. Although both point of views have valid reasons, I believe that players deserve to be paid with high monetary rewards.
It is stated that players are getting what they really deserve. There are several reasons for the players to get paid heavily. For instance, football is very famous and some matches are watched by more than billion people around the world, so there is a huge amount of money raised by a few matches. It is all because of the great skills show by the players participating in the game that is why they deserve to be paid back. Moreover, there is a lot of competition in the sports like football, basketball and baseball so it takes a lot of effort to be one of the players in international team. Furthermore, sport like boxing requires a lot of energy and risk which make players deserving for high rewards.
On the contrary, some people believe that income of players in not reasonable. One of the reasons given is that people participating in different professions like engineering, medical have also given their best in the chosen fields. However, they are usually less compensated with comparison to professionals in famous sports. Secondly, it is believed that huge disparity in the wealth is not healthy for society as a whole and income should be regulated by some brackets.
In the conclusion, I would say that although sports men are getting huge income compared with the professionals in other fields, I believe they have earned it right. Being one of the few hundreds and that too is out of billions of people requires hard work and commitment. Secondly they are source of entertainment for millions around the world, so they deserve to be highly compensated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-29 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
- With the rise of the internet more and more people are getting their news from social media platforms Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or kno 87
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage dose plastic do to the environment What can be done by government and individuals to solve this problem 61
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion 61
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- some people say that now is the best time in history to be living What is your opinion about this What other time in history would be interesting to live in 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...d some matches are watched by more than billion people around the world, so there is a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...r fields, I believe they have earned it right. Being one of the few hundreds and that...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86994219653 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71668460101 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471098265896 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0232171657 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1176470588 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122400616017 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420811595186 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393889556249 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807781983853 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133003018954 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.