nowadays, more and more individuals are willing to watch televisions. it seems that television is an inevitable part of our lives. Although, there are number of drawbacks involved in watching multimedia channels, I, personally, believe that the benefits accruing to ones watching TVs are manifold.
To begin with, watching television is a better alternative in this century. Simply put, in these era, there are more alternatives that can endanger families more than television. Take tablets and smartphones as an example; the more people are banned from watching televisions, the more they are tend to use their tablets and smartphones even in their own rooms which is likely to ruins family relationships sooner than TVs.
Yet another compelling reason is, that by watching televisions there are more likely that individuals gather together and watch the favorite series with each other. That is to say, watching favorite series together, they are having more topics to talk about. Especially, teenagers feel a commonsense with their parents and more bound to share their feelings in this crucial part if their lives.
To sum up, I can understand why some people are thinking that watching TV can take its toll on destroying families, but there are more valuable attributes by watching television for the ones.
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 61
- People find it very difficult to speak in public or to give a presentation before an audience.Do you think public speaking skill is really important? Give reasons. 73
- People live longer today and so people should stay in workforce longer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer Do you agree with this opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
nowadays, more and more individuals are willing ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...duals are willing to watch televisions. it seems that television is an inevitable ...
^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
..., believe that the benefits accruing to ones watching TVs are manifold. To begin wi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this era' or 'these eras'?
Suggestion: this era; these eras
...rnative in this century. Simply put, in these era, there are more alternatives that can e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...watching televisions, the more they are tend to use their tablets and smartphones ev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80269145021 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.920801386 49.4020404114 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175263525536 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813372754553 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446643441268 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108118462756 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232852846034 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.