These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways people relate to one another socially. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, mobile phone and the internet are contributing significantly to the methods of relationship among people with respect to social activities. This high-level technology is often regarded as a huge achievement, but there are some drawbacks threatening to negate the benefit.
Admittedly, social activities are greatly influenced by the invention of mobile phones and internet. With access to an internet-enabled phones, people not only easily make new friends, but they also conveniently connect with each other. This is evident by video-calling applications, such as, Skype and Bandit, which enable people to converse regardless of their location. With these, socializing is easier compared to the past.
Turning to the problems, phones and internet reduce the emotion people feel for each other. Owing to the fact that communication is mostly done online, people often do not relate physically, and as a result, emotion - which usually occurs through eye-to-eye contact and hugs - is fading away. The lesser the one-on-one contact, the faster emotion fades.
As well as the fading of feelings, the employability skills of people are being lost. When we adapt to gadgets and the internet to socialize, we tend to neither confront challenges better nor present topics in front of a group of people clearer. Evidently, recent report states that many job applicants failed due to their inability to express their opinions during interviews. That is to say employment would have been gained successfully if they had mostly communicated and interacted physically rather than online.
In conclusion, mobile phones and internet are considered to be advantageous, but only when people's emotion is intact as well as their job skill is unthreatened. I think people should express feelings more physically; also, they ought to practice speaking face-to-face.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | adeagboridwan | 89 | view |
- your friend is having problems getting on with a colleague at work. He/she has written to you for some adviceIn your letter-Thank your friend for their letter- suggest some ways your friend could improve the situation- offer some encouragement 84
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 67
- Should private schools receive government funding? 78
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. What are the reasons for this? Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who casn go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:- Explain why you cannot go anymore- Say who can go inst 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alizing is easier compared to the past. Turning to the problems, phones and inte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, with respect to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58245614035 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04845593096 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1083834463 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204966024738 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670789860916 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441447028452 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111306991006 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352671480875 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.