Today, the younger and older generations are in the same workplace. Is this more an advantage or more disadvantage?
Nowadays, new and old generations are working in the same organization, which is beneficial for an organization in terms of knowledge transfer from one generation to another and for workplace diversity. However, despite these advantages, there are some drawbacks of having multiple generations in the same company.
There are numerous advantages to a multi-generational workplace. First and foremost, problem-solving becomes easier when ideas and solutions come from young and experienced employees. In other words, juvenile’s creativity and adult’s experience pave the way for better decision making. Further merit is knowledge can be shared from old to new employees, which facilitates business to uphold its brand values in the long run. For instance, International brands, such as Coca-cola and Mercedes Benz, are maintaining their brand reputations not only for their product quality but also by combining their work with young and old employees. Finally, Work culture becomes more dynamic owing to the diversified mindset of a different generation and this dynamism has already been exemplified by the employees in a company from Generation Z, Millennials and Baby boomers.
On the other hand, multiple generations in the same work station have a number of drawbacks. The main demerit is that this type of workforces does not work for every organization. Particularly, in high-tech companies where a frequent change of products or services is imminent and where creativity is imperative for business sustainability. Furthermore, old employees show resistance to any change in the organization and it has been found that this workforce habitually procrastinates any new initiative in the workplace. Lastly, the Study shows that the knowledge gap between old and young colleagues cause dire consequences in decision making. Employee conflict is, therefore, more visible in workplaces where the generation gap is wider.
On the whole, Multi-generational workforce is an asset for any organization and clearly, advantages of it supersede its disadvantages. The limitations of this workforce could be overcome if proper training for old and new employees is ensured. In addition, it is impossible to exclude a whole generation from the workforce, be it young or old, considering long term prospects of a corporation.
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees. Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone.To what extent do you agree? 61
- You and your friend booked a theater tickets in advance. Apology to your friend as you can't make it to the theater with him.In the letter, you should:•apologies•explain what reasons you can’t make it•give options what can be done with the ti 73
- Some people believe in the era of e technology printing newspaper and magazines will cease to occur in the near future To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some young people are leaving countryside to live in cities or towns it leaves only old people in countryside What are the causes of this issue What can be done to solve this problem 89
- Today the younger and older generations are in the same workplace Is this more an advantage or more disadvantage 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64488636364 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39874257976 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553977272727 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2451224693 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.882352941 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186081756059 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666171743025 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666667887234 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12021563231 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158292127597 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.