University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many universities require students to choose specialised subjects for their studies. Some people believe that this is a faulty approach. In their opinion, educational institutes should encourage students to study a variety of subjects. I agree with this view.
Universities should promote all subjects and explain how students can improve their career prospects by learning various subjects. Not all students are supposed to become doctors or engineers. The society needs people possessing various skills. There is yet another dimension to this. When several students learn a particular subject, the demand for that subject will eventually decrease. For example, if everyone opted for computer science, students completing that course will find it difficult to get jobs. In such a situation, the demand for other subjects will increase.
When students learn various subjects instead of focusing on one subject, they will be able to address the needs of the society. This, in turn, will help the growth of the economy.
On the other hand, if everyone studied the same subject, they all would find job in the same industry. Any global economic crisis in that sector will ruin their future and affect the growth of the nation. For example, in India most students prefer to study computer engineering. As a result, software engineers are a dime a dozen in the country. Many of them are struggling to find employment because the supply exceeds the demand. Worse still, a crisis in the IT industry affects all of them and the economy of the nation.
To conclude, the subjects that students learn should not only support their individual growth but also help the development of the nation. Therefore, universities should promote all subjects instead of a handful of prestigious subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | Sndp kaur | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-24 | PRIYANKA1911 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | gagandeep@13 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | ashen.shenal | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | apurwar | 84 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products or is it the responsibility of produces to avoid extra packaging of products.Give your views with any relevant examples of your own experience. 11
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen This is extremely harmful to their development Therefore parents should strictly limit the time that children spend in this way 90
- University students always focus on one specialist subject but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letterdescribe the item you lostexplain how you lost ittell the insura 61
- Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries.what are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 457, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ds the demand. Worse still, a crisis in the IT industry affects all of them and the ec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28222996516 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67018559276 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533101045296 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8713224328 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1904761905 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36367682193 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102964864622 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933567968893 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23051292263 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839231995625 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.