Weddings are more expensive in many countries comparison present and past. What is the reason behind this? Is this a positive or a negative development?
Compare to the past, these days, marriage ceremonies are more lavish in myriad countries. One major cause behind this behavior is the impact of social networking sites on people's life. Despite having advantages this has countless disadvantages due to its relationship to the economic condition.
To begin, social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter cleverly convince its members to upload their special moment's photos for its business purposes and people tend to do that, as a result, the tendency showing off increases. Moreover, the wedding program considers being one of the crucial periods of human life, which is why individual spend as much as possible to make it grand and also bragging about it on social media. For example, 55% of married couple accept the fact that they spend huge capital on their big day to not to get embarrassed by their Facebook friend. So, big budget weddings are not only increasing, but also getting famous day by day.
However, this method has a devastating effect on a person's economic condition because a number of people do not have the ability to have a big fat wedding. If they have a budget crossed expenses, they try to solve the issue by taking a marriage loan. For instance, a renowned bank shows a percentage of taking a wedding loan in 2012 was around 30%, which dramatically increase in 2018 by a percentage of 65%. In addition, it might be difficult for a newlywed couple to get over these debts. Costly weddings are harmful and it is a negative development.
In conclusion, in modern days wedding cost are more expensive than the old days, this is because of the strong position of social networking sites on people's life. For its dangerous effect on a person's economic condition it surely is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-23 | Simranjeetsingh13 | 84 | view |
- more people are spending their free time watching movies. why is this? is it a good thing or bad thing? 61
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Weddings are more expensive in many countries comparison present and past What is the reason behind this Is this a positive or a negative development 85
- there is a increase of noise in our daily life now a days.why is this a problem?what can be done to reduce it 61
- A lot of social problems can be related to teenagers these days Some feel that this is because parents are not able to spend enough time to take care of their teenage child Do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...this method has a devastating effect on a persons economic condition because a number of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'expense'?
Suggestion: expense
... wedding. If they have a budget crossed expenses, they try to solve the issue by taking ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...oples life. For its dangerous effect on a persons economic condition it surely is a negat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92052980132 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71799245862 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0734154894 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151490326753 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055766122046 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565795546667 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112499374362 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674121526617 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.