Are some scientists responsible for the negative impacts made by their discoveries?
Undeniably, any breakthrough made in the field of science symbolizes not only the unmatchable intelligence of mankind, but also significant progress of human society. Some of the most noteworthy discoveries have rendered prestige to scientists due to the far-reaching benefits their achievements have brought to the entire human race. The Nobel Prize and many other high-ranking rewards in science further testify to the importance of scientific discoveries. Nevertheless, regarding the negative impacts produced by some discoveries, a number of people believe that scientists are to blame. In my opinion, such a prejudice should be eliminated.
In fact, everything in the world is double-sided, and scientific discoveries are no exception to this rule. In other words, science is a two-edge sword. If applied in the correct way, it will bring forth tremendous benefits to human beings. Conversely, the abuse or misapplications of scientific discoveries might lead to catastrophes. What's worse, there is also the possibility that some ill-intentioned individuals take advantage of some scientific advancements to commit crimes or other immoral deeds. Radium is an epoch-making discovery made by Madam Curie. X-rays radiated from this element could serve for medical use to cure many fatal diseases including cancer. However, if it is not used in a proper way, the radioactive rays will do harm to human health. Another example lies in nuclear energy, which could be utilized to build nuclear power stations that serve the people. By contrast, the use of nuclear weapons will undoubtedly bring about nightmares to the entire human race. Therefore, it is the shared responsibility of all to guard against any possible hazards some discoveries might produce.
In order to make their discoveries beneficial to society, scientists have a duty to offer effective guidance that helps prevent any potential threats. For instance, before a new discovery is put to use for human needs, the discoverer is obliged to formulate official instructions which must include the most detailed introduction, the most accurate methods of application, and all the areas it can be used, as well as a list of potential side effects or threats it might bring. These preparations are of vital importance, thus deserving wholehearted attentiveness on the part of scientists. Besides, governments should also shoulder the responsibility of supervising the applications of major discoveries, making sure that they are used legally and correctly.
In conclusion, the world of science is full of mysteries that need to be probed deeper by scientists. Without their painstaking efforts and wholehearted dedication, human society can never advance further. Therefore, in spite of those side effects hidden beneath the application of some discoveries, scientists still deserve acknowledgement and support from the general public. It is a combined responsibility for both the scientists and the ordinary people to prevent their negative impact.
- Are some scientists responsible for the negative impacts made by their discoveries 97
- Parents should not express their disagreements to the teacher if parents find the teaching method incorrect. 93
- Should people work in the same company or for the same employer for their whole life? 86
- Are environmental issues too complex to be handled by the individual? 90
- Is it more important to work quickly with risks making mistakes than to work slowly with everything correct? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...coveries are no exception to this rule. In other words, science is a two-edge swor...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...discoveries might lead to catastrophes. Whats worse, there is also the possibility th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...om this element could serve for medical use to cure many fatal diseases including c...
^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ding cancer. However, if it is not used in a proper way, the radioactive rays will do harm to h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ve acknowledgement and support from the general public. It is a combined responsibility for bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56304347826 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24451769683 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0344431293 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336503890568 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768959753647 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997051147581 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19971513711 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556139816225 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.