Because the use of technology such as computers in classrooms for young students has led to many improvements in learning, some people believe that there should be no limits on the number of hours that young students spend using technology during school day. Others believe that too much time spent using technology during school day is harmful and that their use of technology should therefore be limited to one hour or less daily. Which view do you support and why
Technology like computers are involved in our world form sorted trash to satellite control, making our life easy, convenient and efficient. In contemporary school, computers appear in school classrooms as an important tool and more students use computers to learn new knowledge. Therefore some people believe that there should be no limits on the number of hours that young people spend using technology. Others hold the view that there should be some restrictions. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter point.
Firstly, too much time spend on using technology would harm children’s health. If kids stare at a computer screen for a long time and keep one motion constant, their eyesight will suffer greatly and their bodies will be deformed. For example, according to a new survey, many young people now have very poor eyesight and need glasses to see a blackboard clearly. The reason is that most children are exposed to high-tech products at a very young age so that their eye are damaged and difficult to recover from later. As a result, there should be some limitations on the time that kids spend on in school, young people would join more outdoor activities such as basketball games or going around an exhibition. Therefore, adults should require children to use computers during some specific hours at a day, this is conducive to their healthy growth.
In addition, it is difficult to ensure that a child does not get distracted after prolonged exposure to a computer. There are a lot of interesting things in computers like all kinds of movies and videos, children are easily attracted by such amusing content because they have little self-control. For instance, when I use the computer to study, I may be pretty focused at the beginning, and then I will be attracted by other funny programs, so that my work efficiency is not so high. It is hard for me to not be influenced by those programs, let alone young students. Besides, there are some harmful content on the Internet like drugs and violent, if young people are accidentally exposed to these matter, it is hard to guarantee that their mind and body are not affected. Hence, kids should be required to use technology at certain times during school.
Finally, although some people may think that young students should learn how to use computers as early as possible since technology has play an important role now and in the future and those computer skills could bring them lots of improvements in their study, I believe that there should be some requirements about the number of daily use hours. Besides using computers for a long time, children should also take part in more scientific and technological activities and exchange ides with their classmates. There are some important things that computers can not give them.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, I hold the view that there should be confinements on the number of hours that young students spend using technology during school day since too much time exposed on computers would harm their body as well as mental health, their study could also be distracted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s use computers to learn new knowledge. Therefore some people believe that there should b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir bodies will be deformed. For example, according to a new survey, many young pe...
^^
Line 2, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers during some specific hours at a day, this is conducive to their healthy growt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91271347249 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62756761321 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489563567362 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6373279099 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0952380952 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498197416943 0.236089414692 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142657278424 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113494628309 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306467341179 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069200151068 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.