the best way for a teacher to help students to become more interested in a subject is to explain how that subject will help them in their lives outside of school
In contemporary classrooms, teachers attempt diverse ways to appeal to students’ interests. Some authorities are urged that the best approach for a mentor to draw the attention of pupils to a subject is to explain how the subject helps them in real life. From a personal point of view, I definitely agree with this statement and think that if teachers could interpret the theory with practical use, it not only makes kids more motivated to learn the subject but also makes their lives easier.
First of all, by explaining how those intricate theories are applied to reality, the youth could have more confidence to grasp key points in this course. Since supervisors could introduce a theory containing distinct procedures, and then encourage kids to use it in actual situations. When pupils really follow the mentor’s instruction in their daily life, they would master that skill more effectively as well as gain a lot of confidence so as to gain more accomplishments. For example, math teachers frequently teach students some simple operation formulas and remind kids to use them when they buy products in stores. In fact, students not only practice how to use those formulas efficiently but also find they could even calculate faster than a machine. In this way, they would be motivated to learn the discipline more arduous. Consequently, explaining how the subject benefits students’ is a great approach to attract pupils’ interests.
In addition, it should be admitted that some curriculums that combined with actual use would make this subject more attractive and students’ lives more interesting. If mentors never or rarely explain students what is the use of that complicated theory or how it helps him outside of school, they merely teach them a series of elusive knowledge. After a semester, I bet that kids would get bad scores and even lose interest in this disciple. On the contrary, knowledge shines in the minds of children and they have unlimited enthusiasm to learn when they find that subject could create more possibilities. For instance, when English mentors teach pupils some new sentence patterns like could you please do me a favor, they also tell them when is the right situation to use it. Next time if kids go abroad, they will use that sentence and show foreigners that he is very polite. As a result, pupils would make more friends.
Admittedly, many people argue that not all the knowledge within a subject is helpful outside of school, some even make teenagers’s liver harder. However, even if some subjects seem useless now, they would play an important role in the latter. We could not ignore its long-term effects.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, I hold the view that the best way for teachers to draw attention from their students is to introduce how that subject is beneficial to their lives outside of school. As a matter of fact, knowledge comes from life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ely as well as gain a lot of confidence so as to gain more accomplishments. For example,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, really, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98159509202 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6945407954 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501022494888 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3672860155 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2272727273 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86363636364 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376526089284 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104320906768 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949516298424 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234411887933 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736920442121 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.