the best way for a teacher to help students to become more interested in a subject is to explain how that subject will help them in their lives outside of school
There is no doubt that in today’s world societies are constantly struggling to improve the quality of the educational system thereby increasing the productivity of students. In this vein, one method has been recently proposed suggesting that teachers incorporate the applications of courses, which are conducive to students, in their teaching in order to gain students’ attention. While there are contrasting views regarding the proposed method, I believe that it is an efficient approach and will help students to further engage in their study. The following are the reasons to substantiate my view.
First of all, by explaining how those intricate theories are applied to reality, the youth could have more confidence to grasp key points in this course. Supervisors could introduce a theory containing distinct procedures, and then encourage kids to use it in actual situations. When pupils really follow the mentor’s instruction in their daily life, they would master that skill more effectively as well as gain a lot of confidence so as to obtain more accomplishments. Take myself for example, when I was in elementary school, my math teacher taught us the multiplication table, which included a lot of formulas that were hard to remember. He encouraged us to utilize it when we bought merchandise in stores. Surprisingly, once I tried to adopt one formula to calculate the total price of the food I bought, I found that method was so effective and I was even quicker than a machine. In this way, I was motivated to learn the discipline more arduous and had more confident to get good grades. Consequently, explaining how the subject benefits students’ is a great approach to attract pupils’ interests.
In addition, it should be admitted that some curriculums that combined with actual use would make a subject more attractive and students’ lives more interesting. If mentors never or rarely explain students what is the use of that complicated theory or how it helps him outside of school, authorities merely teach pupils a series of elusive knowledge. After a semester, I bet that kids will get bad scores and even lose interests in the disciple. On the contrary, knowledge shines in the minds of children and has unlimited enthusiasm to learn when young people find that a subject could create more possibilities. For instance, when English mentors teach pupils some new sentence patterns like could you please do me a favor, they also tell them when is the right situation to use. Next time if kids go abroad, they will use that sentence and show foreigners he is very polite. As a result, pupils would make more friends.
Admittedly, many people argue that not all the knowledge within a subject is helpful outside of school, some even make teenagers’s liver harder. However, even if some subjects seem useless now, they would play an important role in the latter. We could not ignore its long-term effects.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, I hold the view that the best way for teachers to draw attention from their students is to introduce how that subject is beneficial to their lives outside of school. As a matter of fact, knowledge comes from life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ely as well as gain a lot of confidence so as to obtain more accomplishments. Take mysel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, really, regarding, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, of course, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2667.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02259887006 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85953977707 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0132975981 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358512900941 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783086170272 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811122078368 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183946444319 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609444296603 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.