A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (ages14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to

Essay topics:

A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (ages14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:
1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
2. Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using online material that each teacher will study individually.

The education in today’s people life is one of the first things to put on the table. With help of the education people able to find a better job and improve their life. From this point of view, the government should priorities the education and improve its’ quality. I think first option of small groups of teachers attending classes led by experts is better option than online trainings. I will breach some reasons that validate my position.
To begin with, classes is always more beneficial than online materials. Firstly, because teacher meets personally experts and they are capable to ask some questions, discuss some occasions with expert to get a professional opinion and advice. Some people will argue that online training is better, they will provide some simple reasons like using materials when they free, in their best environment to pursue the most comprehension of the established courses. I take different position because in my opinion personal training is advantages more because it is a personal meeting and questions and issues are always arise.
Second, when people see each other face to face, they can exchange their experience and find it more interesting than just watching some videos or reading some articles. The communication is an important part of human lifetime and people should get it as much as they can. Also, I think trainings in person is more fun, people can tell examples from their daily life, and make jokes to relax for a while and recharge for better understanding the materials. When I got a new position in a different department the administration of our clinic provided some courses for new staff. It was a real fun and the material we studied still in my memory I can recall every main point from the lectures we had. This is why it is more beneficial for every professional in every field to improve their skills and knowledge in trainings with experts alive than online.
To sum up, from established aforementioned reasons it is clear that personal trainings weight more for advancement teachers’ skills and their methods of work.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-03 地狱博士后 73 view
2019-09-06 evancheng 70 view
2019-07-09 alicegreen13 70 view
2019-04-03 MD. TOUKIR HASAN 73 view
2018-08-18 keke 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user alicegreen13 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...ing and questions and issues are always arise. Second, when people see each other f...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, so, still, while, i think, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02005730659 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75191891095 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527220630372 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0315494135 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164475146217 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568119269721 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500920443436 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11050472899 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325921326442 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.