companies should hire their employees for a small period than entire life
In preceding decades, determining the job duration is one of the controversial issues which force some government to amend their labor laws. Some people believe that business has to hire employees for their whole lives in order to the employees do not have financial concern while others think that this type of hiring has many disadvantages. I personally subscribe to the idea that business should hire their employees for a smaller period than entire life with several basic reasons.
To begin with, improving the modern technology and innovating new equipment or programs force the company to hire people who are experts in new fields and can work with this modern devices. On the other hand, the graduated students who have high skill and talent according to last technological science are enthusiastic to work for these companies and launch any professional experience. In this situation existing mandatory compels the company not to hire new persons so not only the performance of company becomes inappropriate but also the job opportunities decreased for the graduated people. According to the statistics from some newspapers, in countries that companies guarantee the entire hiring for their employees, the rate of graduated person decreased. It means that students believe that there is no job vacancies for them to achieve it after their study and the country will suffer serious unemployment rates.
Second, this whole live hiring distracts the employees’s incentive so they are not interested to show their talent or compete with the other experts in other firms. In this situation they do not strive for their job promotion also they might not struggle for their self-development so the efficiency of company and the quality of their products will reduce.
The final reason which convinces me to accept business should hire new generations each year is that sometimes they hire someone who seems suitable at first. But after a while, they cannot satisfy their bosses and needs to change by a new employee. So, in this way, business has not a chance to change a delinquent employee or force employees for being diligent to avoid getting fired.
In conclusion, contemplating on the aforementioned reason, it is obvious that hiring employees for a limited time improve efficiency and product quality of company by using new machines and new techniques which come by new employees. Furthermore, they will give a chance to students who graduate each year from universities and also being able to fire unsatisfied workers.
- companies should hire their employees for a small period than entire life 73
- teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 71
- knowing events around the world is relly important 71
- in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future 76
- people benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ograms force the company to hire people who are experts in new fields and can work with...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... quality of their products will reduce. The final reason which convinces me to a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23774509804 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87829742536 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0855462485 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.466666667 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382622763629 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133625903199 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112003689288 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214051020758 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986115600943 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.