Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In today's sophisticated and progressive world where we live, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effect of the perfect relationship on their lives. Contrary to the opinion of many people that people should find many new friends, while I firmly believe that it is useful for individuals to maintain friendships with a few people for a long time. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my viewpoint.
To begin with, If people maintain friendships for a long time, they will save energy and time. In other words, when they want to find new friends that they need to assign much time and energy to look for reliable friends and develop their relationship. Moreover, people need to talk and go out with different people, so they use a lot of energy and time. For instance, when I was a child, I had a lot of friends that knew each other at school. After I played with all of them, I was very tired. And, I did not devote enough time to my lessons, so I got a bad score in lessons because I spend a lot of energy to play with my new friends. Hence, the more friends they have friends, the more energy and time they will spend.
Secondly, when they get into trouble, just old friends help them, and they can trust. To be more specific, life is full of unexpected emergencies which can cause a lot of anxiety, so people need reliable friends to help them to overcome any obstacles. For example, I can remember a time that I was a student in another city that I have a roommate. And, I got a disease and I did not have enough money for living expenses, and I could not work. When I deal with these problems, he got the job and helped me to treat disease. Therefore, If people have reliable friends for a long time, they can trust them in crisis situations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that is more beneficial and conducive for people to maintain friendships for a long time with a few people. People can maintain their friends, Not only save energy and time but also trust them when they got into trouble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44973544974 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51658923036 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8322858909 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255004824956 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967354535618 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823194410369 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185315899217 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441548013717 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.