Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school.
It is widely accepted that teachers have great influence on their student to stimulate them to move in the way of finding their interests. Hence, it is important for every educator to know how he/she can help the students to move toward the door that lets them to enter into the house of their interest. Some people might argue that explaining the effects of the subjects on students’ life outside the class is better, while others inclined to the idea that there are other wisely ways to give students some tips to become fascinated in a topic. Personally, I agree that there are more effective ways which I explore in the following.
The first reason why I don’t agree with the above statement is that teachers have to put their students between two different situations: living just for themselves? or for other people too? An educator must give to learners a great responsibility such as having effective role in grows of human prosperity. So, student should have a look around their life not only a look at their own life. Moreover, we know that our world always needs coworking of people to become a better place for all of us, and teachers must take students’ attention toward the helping others. Therefore, they can make a big picture in the student’s minds about the subjects. As an example, one of my professors guided me to pay attention on effects of physics in daily people’s life, after that my eyes were opened to understand deeply the subject of physics course and other courses.
Furthermore, teachers should tech their students the life is not just about our interests, and students should learn that the world is not a place to peruse their willing but sometimes they are supposed to do vital works like tying their life to the voluntaries tasks for helping poor people. So, teachers have to educate the subjects through this window’s view of needs our world. In addition, Great women and men in the history we have heard about them were those of people following ideal dreams to make world better place instance of pursuing interests and achieve personal goals.
In conclusion, teachers must open their students’ eyes to think about how the subject can make the world a better place instead of think about their own life, in this way student can make a passion about the topic. Also, educators have to tech students that they sometimes have to do some works which they are not interested in. So, they do not consider just interesting. All in all, following our interesting is necessary, but following what make human prosper is.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who want to be sucessful need to know about several areas but others focus on one skill 76
- Cheeatgrass 3
- TPO 63 3
- Solitary Whale and its unusual high pitch song 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...situations: living just for themselves? or for other people too? An educator must ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83673469388 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50949626123 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482993197279 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4355935554 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334094874371 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101663678017 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611339738343 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224151209149 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485963172642 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.