Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching on consensus whether it is productive to gain deep knowledge of several academic subjects or specialize in a particular topic. Some people hold conflicting ideas. The world we are living is very competitive. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that it would be good decision to achieve different academic subjects. There are sevral reasons that to support my points of view and I would explore a few of the most important ones here. To begin with, we live in modern era where every time create a new branch that means the knowledge we are trying to gain is expanding. So, new job opportunities are opening and it is true that they demand that candidate who has versatile talent. My own experiences is compelling evidence in this case. I come from an agricultural background but I ought to learn distinct programs that is not related to my sector. To be more exact, I learned statistics, R language , python Program and GIS. It is apparent that it is an essential to get better job in my field. Consequently, it helps me to correlate other subjects and makes or invents new things
The second points that comes to mind that it is easy to switch other topics . Although it is an onerous and barden to us to gain knowledge many topics at the same time. But, there is ample evidence suggesting that we can build an excellent career. For instance, I have graduated from Soil, water and envirionment science where I choose three distinct programs what I like. All of them offer me lucrative career and it is only possible when I engage myself in various pragrams. Based on this point, it is commonly admissible that people who are intellegent never confine themselves in particular subject.
Finally, given the factors I outlined above, we may reach the conclusion that though staying in specific issue may lead to expert but hard to find job.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 28 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- Some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 29 integrated writing task 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 944, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... exact, I learned statistics, R language , python Program and GIS. It is apparent ...
^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d that it is easy to switch other topics . Although it is an onerous and barden to...
^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
..., it is commonly admissible that people who are intellegent never confine themselves in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, may, second, so, for instance, in particular, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71515151515 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70850635541 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615151515152 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5736314159 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4444444444 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130081723229 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312959242791 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393189403082 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726415115524 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339787132631 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.