Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Kind of research that you use is an important part of your study. It is what that determine the amount of time you spend on research and increase the quality of your study. Some people believe that it is better to use internet to do research. Others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, it is better to use printed material such as books for two remarkable reasons.
First, there are a lot of resources that still not available in internet. The first type of saving information was transcribed it which has been used for many years untill now. Clearly, it takes a lot of time to transmit these amount of information to internet. Thus, internet resources are not complete yet. For example, when I was in university, I should do a project for my history class. As everyone, at first, I decided to check internet resources, since not only did it take little time but it also was the convenience way. After I prepared the first edition of my project through internet, I showed it to my professor in order to give me his advice to make my project quality better. He offered me to go to library and search for more useful resources. When I went there, I could find the noticeable amount of information. Some of these books were very old which were protected in special conditions that contain precious data. I agree that doing research by printed materials takes more time than doing it through internet, but be sure you don't waste your time, because among printed resources your research has high quality that can be used by other researchers and help to improvement of science. As you can see, using printed material which includes vaster resources is better for your research.
Second, there are a lot of countries that don't access to internet. Although the technology improves very fast, there are some countries that don't have necessary requirements for survive. For instance, a study shows that in some part of Africa, people suffer from lack of water or food. They don't have schools in their own city and usually students should go to the nearest school in other city. Even in cities with schools the level of education is low and they hardly can accesses printed books. There for, it is obvious they can not use internet and access it easily. If there were internet in all places, the internet resources would be good choice for doing research.
In conclusion, it is better to use printed resources to do a research. Not only are there a great number of resources not available in internet, but also there are countries that don't access to internet. I think people should use printed materials, since it increase their research quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture about solutions to frog population decline, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about frog population decline. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking websites. Use specific reasons and examples t 86
- : Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1049, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ng it through internet, but be sure you dont waste your time, because among printed ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cond, there are a lot of countries that dont access to internet. Although the techn...
^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ery fast, there are some countries that dont have necessary requirements for survive...
^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt of Africa, people suffer from lack of water or food. They dont have schools in...
^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uffer from lack of water or food. They dont have schools in their own city and usua...
^^^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'access'
Suggestion: access
...of education is low and they hardly can accesses printed books. There for, it is obvious...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 60, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...s better to use printed resources to do a research. Not only are there a great number of r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rnet, but also there are countries that dont access to internet. I think people shou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75541125541 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53082049523 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465367965368 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6540207241 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3703703704 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345090271769 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104936954637 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11290426204 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253889270227 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096208457697 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.