Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning.
As an inseparable part of education-oriented civilizations, education is inextricably intertwined with people's lives. Some people subscribe to the view that teachers should be either popular among students or effective in helping them in learning. As far as I am concerned, I personally believe that in this day and age, it is easy for teachers to be popular and effective as well.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that social networks pave the way for teachers to provide intimate and efficient classes for students. It is hard to overlook the crucial influence of social media such as Facebook, Tweeter and other user-friendly applications on today’s people’s lives, especially on schools as an important part of the society. Social networks provide an exclusive atmosphere for teachers to increase their classes productivity. To be more specific, thanks to the social media, students and teachers can be in close contact with each other day-in-day-out around the clock; therefore, they can have a better understanding of each other which positively affect the class efficiency. Furthermore, teachers can set up a special group for their students to send them their homework regularly and explain their difficulties they encounter during solving the problems. As a case in point, I vividly remember, when I was in high school, I had a hard time dealing with math problems, and the books were very difficult for me. After one month when all the students complained about the difficulties of the homework, our teacher established a math group in Facebook for us which gave us an opportunity to ask our questions when we were doing our homework at home. Not to mention about the effectiveness of that group that really revolutionized my math grade. As a matter of fact, this group not only does help us to have a better understanding of the math, but also provides a brilliant situation for us to get a good feeling from our teacher. Hence, my personal experience competently corroborates the fact that social media helps students and teachers to have the effective class in the warm environment, which is beneficial for either party.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that new technology offers a wide assortment of new techniques for teachers to have efficient and friendly classes. It goes without saying that new technology provides a variegated stream of new approaches for teaching. From psychological perspectives, there are various new methods that not only do teach the teachers to provide a friendly setting for students, but also help them to train students in the way that the lessons never fade in their minds. It is axiomatic that new empirical approaches along with observational methods as powerful approaches can enhance the students learning process. Performing different tasks by students under the teacher’s supervision provides a warm and friendly situation for the teacher to talk in a more intimate way with them in order to make a closer relationship. For example, tracing back to four years ago, when I was attending the University of Tehran. I had a memorable class that always held in the lab setting, which really helped us to extend our knowledge due to the fact that we never forgot the experimental results we gained through different lessons. Besides, carrying out the tasks with our teacher allows us to have a closer relationship with him. Hence, these worthwhile experience shed some light on the view that new methods offer by the progressing technology enables teachers to provide friendly-efficient classes.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly agree with this standpoint that teachers can manage efficiency and intimacy of theirs classes easily. It is highly recommended that more teachers strive to provide efficient-intimate classes for the students for the sake of that the more students have a friendly atmosphere in their classes, the better they learn their courses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Yeganeh | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Yeganeh | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | paris.alaei@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | mobinaHosseini | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-24 | goharzay.m | 73 | view |
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary. 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. TPO 6 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary. 90
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...aches can enhance the students learning process. Performing different tasks by students...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3366.0 1977.66487455 170% => OK
No of words: 645.0 407.700716846 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21860465116 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03952876749 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1140452482 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 212.727598566 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475968992248 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1026.9 618.680645161 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3096614096 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95833333333 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286851342775 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898206417376 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606278803309 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197516949714 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526903826192 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.