Generally speaking, the best work hours differing for people with various attitudes. Some people believe that it is better to have a job where they work more days and short hours. In contrast, some others think that it is more enjoyable to work fewer days but with long hours. I personally, concur with the latter one. The subsequent paragraphs will delineate my perspective on this issue.
First of all, working for fewer days give people more time to have fun and being with family and friends. In other words, have more days off in the week gives the chance to enjoy more in life. So it will enhance people’s life quality. By way of example, I am an extroverted person and love to spend time with my loved ones such as family or friends, and it gives lots of positive energy to me. Hence working three days a week and having more vacation is more helpful for me. This clearly shows that working few days a week for long hours is more efficient.
Furthermore, decreasing the number of workdays will improve employees’ performance and flourish the company. I mean when employees are aware of their long vacation during the week, have more incentive to do their responsibility as best as possible and on time. My own story is a compelling example of this. Once, I was working in a company which employees should work five days a week, I was too exhausted because I had not enough off-day in the week and my efficiency was diminished. But, last year I was moved to a new company which has not any rule about peoples workdays or work hours, and it completely depends on every individual. This conversion, increase my incentive and prosper my efficiency.
In summary, all the above-mentioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that working three days a week for long hours is better than working five days a week and short hours. this is because having more time for fun and entertainment, more incentive in work hours and better performance. Hence, I suggest managers and leaders give their employees freedom for choosing the number of workdays.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...it gives lots of positive energy to me. Hence working three days a week and having mo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rking five days a week and short hours. this is because having more time for fun and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, as to, i mean, in contrast, in summary, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74860335196 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64246991151 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502793296089 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6652185535 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39799096639 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128447165436 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114305535729 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269970933888 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753548654646 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.