Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
It is highly accepted that each government spends lots of money on different issues. Most of the time, governments allocate federal funds to research about environment or economy, but the question of whether governments should fund space travel or not, has long been a topic of controversy among people. Some people believe that it is a waste of money to fund space travel, some other, nevertheless, take an opposite point. Personally, I am a favor of space exploration so I firmly agree with this statement. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my viewpoint through two outstanding reasons.
To begin with, finding a new planet for living is a considerable concern among researchers. Astronauts conduct plentiful research on finding the planet which has the condition of living since the rate of using earth’s resources increases daily as a result of population growth. If this increase continues, one day we will face lack of resources for living. There are a lot of things we do not know about space yet because of its extension. So we always have the chance to find a new planet that might be better for living with more water and space. Above statement only can happen if governments consider space exploration as a chief concern that needs to be funded adequately. For instance, by these explorations, Astronauts find out the existence of some resources such as water in the Mars. Hence, by more space travel, we have more planets suitable for living.
Moreover, we are always doubtful about the existence of aliens in other planets which we have not found yet. There is no evidence about this issue, but as we mentioned to the extension of space in the above paragraph, nothing is impossible. It is obvious from science fiction movies which are intensely celebrated by lots of people, that people all have been curious about existence and living of new creatures for many years. Also, thinking about this issue is enjoyable and frightening for most of them. For example, I remembered that whenever I saw some colorful lights in the sky in my childhood, I thought it was a spacecraft or some aliens who would like to come to our planet and annoy us or if they were kind, they would help us. I know that this imagination is really creepy, but it was literally enjoyable for me. I am sure that there are plenty of people who had my imagination in their childhood so this issue is actually a public concern. The only way to face this concern is conducting numerous research and exploring space which cannot be done without government support because it needs a large amount of money.
In conclusion, by taking into account the above- mentioned reasons, I believe that governments should fund space exploration. I feel this way because not only we can find another appropriate planet for living but also we may gain some information about aliens. It is highly recommended that governments take space exploration seriously and try to fix its financial requirements properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | ReihanehM | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | wenbxh | 60 | view |
| 2018-09-26 | pershin_sh | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | goharzay.m | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...earch about environment or economy, but the question of whether governments should fund space travel or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94257425743 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78657979576 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508910891089 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5177672084 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243170309052 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741462696227 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570799671459 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167330134241 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723730302561 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.