Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to it is paramount importance, parents try to help their children to have a high quality of education. A controversial question which is often raised this idea whether, in this age, parents more complicated their children's education than parents in the past or not. I personally contend that in this age, parents spend more time than previous parents for their children; therefore, I agree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite factor to be mention is that in this age most fathers and mothers have only a child; hence, they are trying to grow up a child in the best ways. To elaborate on my points, since parents have a child, they want to their child become a flourishing person. In other words, parents try to check their education their offspring. and enrol them in the best school. Because their children must have a high rank of a score for entering to the best university so that they will find a suitable job and career. In contrast, in the past, as fathers and mothers had many children, they could not check their children education individually. Also, their children had much duty. For example, the girls had to clean their home, cook food and help their mothers. In addition, the boys had to work on the land and help their fathers. These duties were more important than their study for in the previous generation.
Another reasons which deserves some words here is that I believe that fathers and mother having high sensitive about a method of growing their children like instruction, food and playing; therefore, it is originating from having a single child. In another world, since parents have a child, they spend most of time and energy for improving kid. Actually, a juvenile is like an asset for them; for these reasons, parents who have only one child have to tend pay attention to him or her. In contrast, in the past people have many children; then, parents had less responsibility for their children. As soon as growing up, the children had to work hard, girls in the house and boys in the farmland. The difficult condition of life did not allow parents to put enough time for the children.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the role of parents in the education of children are more potent in comparison with the past. It is because they want children to have a better life in the future, and they have only one or two children; therefore, children success' as the same as parents' success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | aymenhamrouni | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kangyan | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | fafar | 90 | view |
- If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend which of the following will you choose Why Find a roommate to share a room Do not buy the latest mobile phone Buy new technological devices less frequently Buy cheap foods and cook h 70
- Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class Which one do you prefer Use specific reasons and detailed examples to support your answer 73
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing 78
- Do you agree or disagree? in order to be well-information, a person must get information from many different resource. 70
- tpo 30 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... check their education their offspring. and enrol them in the best school. Because ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78681318681 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58691308498 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463736263736 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1173738219 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6956521739 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7826086957 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277220013546 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976073087326 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076570705494 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206483271771 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626509120122 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.