Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.
There are lots of books that are about real and unreal things. It is true that reading books that are about real events, real people, and established facts can ensure us to know things that are true instead of fiction; however, I do not agree with the statement for several reasons. Following is a brief explanation of my view.
First, reading books that are not about real can stimulate our imagination. To be specific, I love to read fiction novels since everything is possible in the stories. There are always exciting and incredible plots that stimulate my imagination. I will imagine that I can fly and beat the bad elves with my team members or imagine that I am Harry Potter who can do magic and make people around me stand still.
Second, reading books that are about real and unreal can broaden our horizon. To illustrate, I read both kinds of books because they both have their own value. On one hand, reading books that are real can increase our intellectual. I love to read books that are related to historical events because the contents are interesting and inspiring. I can learn knowledge from these kinds of books. On the other hand, reading books that are unreal can improve my creativity. Since I love to read fiction novels and there are lots of fantasy and innovation plots in the stories, my minds are full of crazy ideas. Both kinds of books can increase our experience and open our mind.
In conclusion, I believe that people should not only read books that are about real events, real people, and established facts because of the reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | nazp | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-13 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
| 2018-03-01 | 1997jenniferho | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | 1997jenniferho | 60 | view |
| 2018-01-19 | Suchismita Choudhary | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and make people around me stand still. Second, reading books that are about rea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74007220217 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44454719142 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472924187726 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3233557559 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0625 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310227523866 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11222928035 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115199617245 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252985872605 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130217399031 0.0645574589148 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.