Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) is less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problems to the public.
There is no shortage of debate about news accuracy in the world. Although many believe media is more concerned about the accuracy of news and incorrect information do not cause serious problems to the public, I, on the other hand, believe in these days news channel is less concerned about the news accuracy than the past and wrong information has negative effect and will cause more difficulties to the public. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the fowling.
To begin with, nowadays people access to myriad news channel, thanks to internet and satellite TV, and there is a competition between news channel. They want to attract more audience to their channel, in order to attract more company to advertise their product on their channel and more TV advertisement means more money. Thus, they use many sources, such as their exclusive correspondent, You Tube video, or social networks, to release first hand news. Because they want to be the first channel which contacted news, they do not have enough time to check the news accuracy. Not only that but also, they do not have enough employee to check video sources or information accuracy, they might to release incorrect information. In contrast, in the past media got their information only by their local or international correspondent, hence they were sure about information accuracy.
Moreover, in the past less people tend to watch TV and because they did not access to internet. Therefore incorrect information has less effect on their daily lives. But today more people Watch TV and they became interested in political issues. the incorrect information may cause severe problems to the public. For instance, ten years later, we had election in Iran. A week before Election Day one Twitter user released fake news about about one candidate. However we all believed he would win the election, but his hardliner rival won that election and we faced many challenges in our country.
Last but not the least, technology changed all apescts of our lives, and it is really hard to distinquisee between CGI and real. Accordingly, many news media expert cannot distinguished between real video or fake one. For example, I recall that several years later CNN shown a video about one Eggale took a baby and they said it happen in Dallas, TX, But then they relished that video was fake and some one made that video by Computer.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe that incorrect information may cause serious problems to the public and media is not concern abut the accuracy of news as they did in the past. This is because they do not have enough time and employee to check the information accuracy, and because the umber of information produce is innumerable.
- Tpo 44 78
- Do you agree or disagree? The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character. 60
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 42
- TPO 53 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... I, on the other hand, believe in these days news channel is less concerned about th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent, You Tube video, or social networks, to release first hand news. Because they...
^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tion accuracy. Moreover, in the past less people tend to watch TV and because the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ecause they did not access to internet. Therefore incorrect information has less effect o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...became interested in political issues. the incorrect information may cause severe ...
^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
...Day one Twitter user released fake news about about one candidate. However we all believed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ed fake news about about one candidate. However we all believed he would win the electi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...isee between CGI and real. Accordingly, many news media expert cannot distinguished ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...isee between CGI and real. Accordingly, many news media expert cannot distinguished betwe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een real video or fake one. For example, I recall that several years later CNN sh...
^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
...one Eggale took a baby and they said it happen in Dallas, TX, But then they relished t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...n they relished that video was fake and some one made that video by Computer. In co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9552238806 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65811583783 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6989717647 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7619047619 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343823679026 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10731794393 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10632312828 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207470603679 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10841484443 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.