Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not.
What are the traits of successful students? It is an appealing question that most students and parents want to know the answer. One of the probable answers is that students who keep their room neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than ones who do not. Some people agree with the statement while some of them do not. I personally disagree with the statement and I will shed light on my rationales in the following paragraphs.
First, some students are very successful but their rooms are not tidy and organized. Indeed, they prefer to study different sources for their lessons, search about their favorite subjects to get more information and do more practice in order to learn the lessons better. Thus, they do not have enough time to spend on tidying up their rooms. Take my sister as a convincing example. My sister is among the three top students in her school. She studies 5 hours a day and does a lot of extra practice to learn her lessons by heart. Also, she is learning a musical instrument and French both of which need to be allocated a lot of time for them to practiced and do their assignments. Obviously, she is busy and does not have enough time to keep her room neat.
Second, keeping the room neat and organized absolutely depends on what the priority of students is in their life. Some students prefer to spend their time on doing extra activities like doing sport and being with their friends rather than tidy their rooms. They think that their performance and incentive considerably will be enhanced by doing these kinds of activities as a result, they will get better grades in school. Therefore, they put them first in their scheduling. Back to my sister's example. She believes that tidying up her rooms is time and energy consuming. So, she would like to spend her time in other activities giving her energy like riding bicycle, going to the cinema and going to the sports center with her friends. Entertainment plans with her friend are her priority and it is not important for her to keep her room organized.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that there is no relation between being neat and being a successful student. Some students are good at their studying and do not spend their time on tidying their room just because they are busy with other beneficial activities and their priority is different.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-24 | Atrin@21 | view | |
2022-12-02 | wqx | 90 | view |
2021-07-02 | leilapaidar | 66 | view |
2019-11-14 | Honey_ashr | 44 | view |
2019-08-21 | Neshat-ygn | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country 72
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sports teach people lessons about life 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e statement while some of them do not. I personally disagree with the statement a...
^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neat and organized absolutely depends on what the priority of students is in thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71770334928 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50660170907 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461722488038 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4018336927 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7391304348 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445847389597 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125585996579 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12255446519 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315337452459 0.150856017488 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147653771541 0.0645574589148 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.