You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her?
Throughout history, people due to social nature have been inclined to establish various kinds of relationships. One of the most important relationships is friendship, which is of significant effects on diverse facets of life. In this regard, there is a controversial issue that whether we should break up with our friends if they have different points of view or make a mistake. Some people believe that friendship is not equal to have exactly a similar mindset and we should accept each other with differences and continue to be friends. I strongly concur with this idea, and I will shed light on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first salient aspect to point out is that, contrary to common belief, disagreeing about the same subject is not always bad. Indeed, various outlooks open the door to be familiar with varied subjects that we might never face them if we lose touch with our friends. Moreover, knowing about divergent views leads to having an open mind, which helps us to rightly make a decision in other parts of our life. Thus if a friend does something that is opposed to our beliefs or ideas, we should not just continue to be friends with them but also look at it as an unrepeatable chance to learn a new thing. Take a political election as an instance. It is obvious that everyone has a different political viewpoint. Conversing with our friends about different parties and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each one helps us to vote consciously.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance is that living peacefully with people with different viewpoints and forgiving their mistakes are the skills that let us mature emotionally and mentally. In fact, these worthwhile skills are necessary to integrate into society and be successful in our social life. Needless to say, friendship serves as a place to practice and learn these two significant skills. According to a psychological study conducted in a distinguished university, people who have friends with dissimilar beliefs and appropriately deal with all of them are accepted more in society, so they thrive in social life. Professor Jackson, the head of the study, says that “the more people properly manage the differences, the more opportunities they get in their life”.
To top off the discussion, it is necessary to know that disagreements and mistakes are not judicious reasons to break up with our friends. If we learn to manage our friendship with differences and difficulties, not only do we have a chance to experience new subjects, but also we can develop our personal skills to tranquilly live with other people in a society. Therefore, I highly recommended that we take advantages of disputes and blunders to grow our personality and our mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | hazrat | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | mrm2559 | 76 | view |
| 2021-03-29 | Negintavakkoli | 60 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | f.heido | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | erfan_shak | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 73
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sports teach people lessons about life 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... a decision in other parts of our life. Thus if a friend does something that is oppo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01952277657 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9223493026 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522776572668 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2729045014 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.05 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203425022161 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061985717263 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603468557369 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134686780668 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358095044392 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.