You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her？
From the dawn of humans life, making relationship and maintaining them is one of the most important one's desire in their life. As far as relationships is concerned, in this case permanent friendship, some people believe that one should make communication just with people who are in the same point of view as them, while others believe otherwise. I, personally, subscribe to the latter group, who can accept a variety of perspectives. There are quite a few reasons to support this view, some of which are as follows.
First, one should try to accept a broad spectrum of ideas and behavior so as to make a great communication. in my point of view, eliminating long-lasting friends because of something that they do, which can dissatisfaction you, is totally disapproved. If this happen, people should make a colony around themselves and communicate with identical people as they are, which make an awful situation in which people cannot tolerate other toughs and ideas, even their durable friends, leading to some conflict between people. On the other hand, if friends can respect to each other and keep relation even with totally different people, they can make more strong and stable relation. One of the manifestation of these perspective would be a calm society in which people with a variety of ideas can live together without any problems.
Second, people with a variety points of view can make a blessing in disguise. At first glance, having friends with a contract perspective seems to make a tough situation in which both parties have to criticize each other constantly. However, with a close thought, one can find that by doing so he or she can improve their negotiation skills due to the fact that they should always persuade each other by reasoning and logic. On the other hand, having friends who usually approve you and do not criticize you can make "Jack a dull boy", leading friendship to a boring situation. By and large, the differences in perspectives can pave the way for improving some skills and make a challenging environment in which people can enjoy of discussion and debates.
In conclusion, by taking all reasons and consideration into account, I do believe that having friends with different background have many benefits for people. Therefore, they should be open enough to enjoy its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | hazrat | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | mrm2559 | 76 | view |
| 2021-03-29 | Negintavakkoli | 60 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | f.heido | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | erfan_shak | 71 | view |
- TPO 28 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study in 70
- Do you agree or disagree The way people dress is a good indication of their personality or character 80
- It is more enjoyable to work for three days with longer hours or to work in five days with shorter hours Do you agree or disagree 73
- Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... a broad spectrum of ideas and behavior so as to make a great communication in my point ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...t they do which can dissatisfaction you is totally disapproved If this happen peop...
^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this perspective' or 'these perspectives'?
Suggestion: this perspective; these perspectives
...le relation One of the manifestation of these perspective would be a calm society in which people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91237113402 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73180800985 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 388.0 20.1344086022 1927% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1906.0 100.406767564 1898% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 388.0 20.6045352989 1883% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 103.0 5.45110844103 1890% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222449744306 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222449744306 0.076458572812 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155827131081 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723752872882 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 195.7 11.7677419355 1663% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -313.88 58.1214874552 -540% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 153.4 10.1575268817 1510% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.68 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.61 8.01818996416 319% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.002688172 560% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 157.2 10.0537634409 1564% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.