Do you agree or disagree It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with your
friends?

Communication and relationship is one of the most pivotal things in one's life, human beings, therefore, always have taken measure to improve and last their relation. As far as honestly concerened, some people believe that one should be honest with their friends, without any exception, while others believe telling lie, sometimes, is unavoidable. I, peronally, believe that both idea have their own merits and demerits; however, telling white lie in some cases would be practical for keeping a relation.

Telling truth for all times have some benfits, some of which are elaborated upon in the following. First, it make trust through a freindship, which is one of the most crucial factor in a relation. Given two freinds as an example, if they are honeset with each other, all the times, their relation would be based on truth and they relaible for each otehrs. Moreover, telling truth can pave the way for having a long-lasting relations. When two people was honest enough to make trust for their friends, these types of people are so priceless person, having relation with them is very enjoyable.

Despite all advantages, however, being honest "completely" have their own disadvantages among which bothering freinds which breed lonely are more noticeable. Telling truth every times might suffer others due to the fact that it make people frank, which is not acceptable behavior for others. For example, when a freidns buy a shirt, an ugly shirt, and her or his friends in the fisrt reaction toward the shirt emphasize on its "uglying"--in this frank way--shirt man might suffer from these behaviors. As a result of such personality, one may lose his- or her friends constantly and being alone, which can make so complicated a situation for human benigs because having relation is one of the basic needs for any individuals.

In conclusion, having the aforementioned reason and consideration into account, telling truth in all time can have some drawback for people. Therefore, one should set their principle based on truth, but in some case should be wise enough to telling a white lie in a political way to preventing from a ruioning a realtion.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-13 faezeh1376 70 view
2021-09-28 meliiw_amd 71 view
2021-09-27 hazrat 76 view
2021-06-16 rez__k 76 view
2021-04-24 Negintavakkoli 90 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ip is one of the most pivotal things in ones life, human beings, therefore, always h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...orated upon in the following. First, it make trust through a freindship, which is on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relation'?
Suggestion: relation
... pave the way for having a long-lasting relations. When two people was honest enough to m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a political way" with adverb for "political"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d be wise enough to telling a white lie in a political way to preventing from a ruioning a realtio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, honestly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1323943662 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97669317223 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0689440242 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098138983472 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368240418612 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037828172062 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631508689778 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291766479695 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.