Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, successful in a job depends on many factors that the ability to communicate with others and studying hard are the two main factors that have a significant role in the progress of our future job. This is a heated debate which of them is more important. Definitely, some people if asked would agree with the statement the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school while others have a negative attitude. As I am concerned, I disagree with this opinion. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on arguments for supporting my view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that with study at university you gain some knowledge and skills that are necessary to become a success at work. University curriculum usually bases on the skills that could be useful for the student’s job. Because of this, in many companies, one of the requirements is academic education and they tend to hire people with a good resume in school. In other word, ones with the best grade and graduate from an outstanding university have a more chance to get the position job. The purpose of these requirements is that they know individuals with a proper resume are trained perfectly and they do their job according to their knowledge and skills.
Another reason that deserves some words is that in the workplace you confront with a sophisticated task that only you can solve just by specific information. This info teaches in the school. Students that study hard often time spend a lot of hours on different material and search on many databases and references to become expert in their field. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. When in a computer company, some problems happen in network and company have to hold some meeting to find the main reason for the problem and eliminate it. Many engineers participate in this session and discuss problems m but they could not solve the problem and in this time, just an expert person be able to solve the enigma. Consequently, he/ she gets a promotion in his/her job. As you can see without proper knowledge, these meetings and communications are not useful.
By the way of conclusion, base on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that hard effort in school results in knowledge that give you more chance to get the job and help you become outstanding employee and progress in your job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- TPO 34 80
- Has the ease of cooking improved life? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Should people do things that they do not like 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding employee and progress in your job.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, well, while, in fact, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82211538462 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70586815056 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1436276856 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.578947368 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356717662784 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890078563319 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785529807255 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206366814889 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107157975993 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.