Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are always been appreciated no matter of time in which they lived. Some people argue that teachers in the past are very hard working because there was no technological invention as of today. Because of that, they were valued for their hard work in society. As of my concern, teachers are always at a level to receive respect and to be appreciated even in the modern era. The points which I chose to explain this situation can be elaborated below.
To begin with, though present teachers are using technology to teach their students, they even have to work hard to learn how the technology works. No individual is born with the knowledge of everything. So, the teachers should be respected not only because of their hard work but also the enthusiasm to learn by themselves so that they teach students. Many people are of the opinion that teachers don't do hard work because they just make students learn by themselves which is a very difficult task to be exploited by students. For example, when I was in my eighth standard I was given a project of building electricity from gobar gas. My class teacher was very concerned about me and she assured me that she will help me with my project. For that, as I was very little to understand the concept she used the technology to learn about electricity generation. Later, she taught me very clearly about project I was doing and I secured with a good grade. This shows even though you have the technology by side you also need teachers who educate students on how it works.
Moreover, nowadays teachers are multi-talented to teach their students whatever they want. Some times, teachers will ensure that their children are not addicted to modern innovations because it will harm their health. some argue that technology teaches us everything and there is no need for a teacher to study because nowadays everything is available on the internet. Furthermore, many students are learning things just by watching some youtube channels. For instance, when I was a kid my mentor always encouraged me to read books and to play with my mates rather than watching television. Additionally, that habit of mine inculcated with deeper roots. Eventually, I was in good health all the time. On top of it, with good health, I reached my goal very charmingly. From this, we can depict that teachers are always well-wishers of students by providing good health for their future.
All in all, I vehemently assert that teachers are more appreciated and valued nowadays than in the past. They will not only work hard in order to help their students and to teach them the new technology working but also provide good health by preventing them from addiction to harmful habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- four day week working program 80
- Possibilities of living on Mars 73
- The food industry has been overusing hard to recycle plastic packaging However it has caused severe environmental issues As a solution to the plastic packaging crisis casein based plastic packages which are made out of milk proteins have recently been inv 85
- burning mirror 76
- team work in a project 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...people are of the opinion that teachers dont do hard work because they just make stu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ions because it will harm their health. some argue that technology teaches us everyt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82618025751 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6345508507 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448497854077 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1334415743 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.96 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.64 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169225306523 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562447402075 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518447482168 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120565737491 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022118601794 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.