Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether by using technology, children are less productive or not than in past times. Some people hold conflicting views. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that it makes more creative, more thoughtful than before. There are many reasons that support my point of view and I would explore a few of them the most important ones here. The primary reason we have to take into consideration is that we now know every sector of knowledge and get everything easily. It is generally believed that it was unlikely to know and rare to find any materials. To be more exact, the resources are not available, not advanced, and very expensive to purchase. My own experience is more compelling evidence for it. When i was in class six, many child used computer. But, it took lot of money and did not do many things due to limited resources. As a result, though they had potential talent, they did not contribute more enough. Now, it is commonly admissible that buying a computer is more easy and there a lot tutorial video where they can learn anythings. Therefore, at present time, children more creative and it is obvious that they can make any robotics at the age of class six. However, having said this, children are more advance to create any scientific tools. The second points that comes my mind that the world is too competitive and parents want that their children should involve various programs. For instance, my student who is a student of class seven. He participated a scientific competition in last year. He made a cycle which consist of bamboo. The main purpose of this project to reduce the green house by diminishing fuel energy. I was wondered and surprised that how he made it without any one help. In contrast, in that time i wasted my time doing nothing and it is true that I would never conceive or made it. Finally, given the factors, above I may a reach a conclusion that children are more active making robots, more enthusiastic engaging in many programs
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 73 | view |
- TPO 41 integrated writing 70
- Integrated writing TPO 19 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 763, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s more compelling evidence for it. When i was in class six, many child used compu...
^
Line 1, column 1792, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...any one help. In contrast, in that time i wasted my time doing nothing and it is ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66201117318 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61073383376 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.777743418 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8636363636 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133079813075 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335054060334 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356349544332 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133079813075 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.