Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Today's media (TV, newspapers, and magazines, for example) offer a lot of information on many topics, but people do not use this information to really learn something thoroughly and in depth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In today's world, where technology is so advanced and is improving by the day, we are bombarded by a plethora of information of various kinds and from multiple sources, such as social media, radio, television, newspaper and so on. How people use this information changes from person to person.
We live in an era that is extremely face-paced and to keep pace with it, we need to move quickly too. People nowadays are too busy and have too much to worry about to care about thoroughly reading new topics and going in-depth with new research and news regularly. For instance, people may only read the headline of a breaking news or at most skim the article. They do not have time to read the entire article and have more important things to do. They know that they can get more insight on the topic by discussion with friends and family members, as the subject would inevitably arise if it is breaking news or a significant discovery.
However, school and university students make greater use of the topics covered by news sites. These facilitate writing out essays, thesis and carrying out case studies. Students need to read the articles in depth and analyze it for their assignment. It is crucial that they research the topics and learn from them in order to produce high quality work.
In short, the fact that people do not learn topics in depth cannot be applied to everyone. A person who works full time or is a parent cannot be expected to have enough time to pore over information. On the other hand, it is incumbent on students to avail of this abundance of information for their benefit. All in all, the amount of time someone spends on studying a certain topic depends on their circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | Alina_irfan | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | Zebranah | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-09 | Varun sridhar | 87 | view |
- many people believe that greed or the desire to have more wealth than other people have is a bad characteristic people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind However some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a perso 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For students the ability to listen well is as important as the ability to read well 70
- If you could study a subject that you have never had the opportunity to study what would you choose Explain your choice using specific reasons and details 73
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which do you prefer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortant things to do. They know that they can get more insight on the topic by dis...
^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...applied to everyone. A person who works full time or is a parent cannot be expected to ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, for instance, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70666666667 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53595478403 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2424632627 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223764862773 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069288158959 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531846914862 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123354561366 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264102543347 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.