Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The prediction of the future is always one of the most interesting subjects in public debates or even in scientific ones. one of the hottest debates is about the future of cars. personally, I anticipate that the number of cars in twenty years later will be fewer than today and substantiate my idea by providing some supportive reasons elucidated below.
First and foremost, today's car will be replaced by other vehicles like trains, airplanes, etc. because of the growth of the population of big cities, the public transportation will be an important issue in twenty years later. if everybody uses his/her personal car for going to his/her work, shopping, etc the traffic in cities will be so heavy, so I think that the governments encourage people to use public transportation rather than driving car. also, because of the development of technology, I believe that new methods and vehicles will be invented to transport more population. as a result, people will be more comfortable to use public vehicles for transporting rather than their personal cars. this phenomenon reduces the demand for cars.
Furthermore, time and energy will be more important in twenty years later, so I think new devices will be invented to transport people faster and consume less fuel. we see some imaginative vehicles in movies similar to today's cars but they are not exactly the same car. they don't have any wheels and move in the air, not on the ground. these devices don't have a fraction with the ground and can move faster; moreover, they will be more efficient in fuel consumption because they use renewable energy rather than fossil fuels. in addition, they reduce air pollution by using clean fuel like solar energy, hybrid, etc. therefore, they will be produced in mass numbers and reduce the number of future cars.
consequently, based on the above discussion, the development of public transportation and the invention of more beneficial vehicles cause the reduction of cars in twenty years later. so, I strongly believe that we have fewer cars in twenty yeqars later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decision for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 76
- Agree or disagree? The rules that society today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...lic debates or even in scientific ones. one of the hottest debates is about the fut...
^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...st debates is about the future of cars. personally, I anticipate that the number of cars i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... important issue in twenty years later. if everybody uses his/her personal car for...
^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...transportation rather than driving car. also, because of the development of technolo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... invented to transport more population. as a result, people will be more comfortab...
^^
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...orting rather than their personal cars. this phenomenon reduces the demand for cars....
^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...rt people faster and consume less fuel. we see some imaginative vehicles in movies...
^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... but they are not exactly the same car. they dont have any wheels and move in the ai...
^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...they are not exactly the same car. they dont have any wheels and move in the air, no...
^^^^
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...and move in the air, not on the ground. these devices dont have a fraction with the g...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e air, not on the ground. these devices dont have a fraction with the ground and can...
^^^^
Line 9, column 527, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ewable energy rather than fossil fuels. in addition, they reduce air pollution by ...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... reduce the number of future cars. consequently, based on the above discussion, the dev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...eduction of cars in twenty years later. so, I strongly believe that we have fewer ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, i think, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05539358601 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73568209314 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1701602818 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278180606208 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913157902625 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715808983798 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172162301828 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343765843657 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.