Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study.
There is a common topic concerning whether universities are supposed to ask their students to take basic science classes even though the courses are not part of their majors. Although some people tend to hold the idea that signing up for basic science classes is a waste of time, from my perspective, basic science subjects, such as math and literature, may have copious benefits.
To begin with, basic science lessons can help the students perform well in their major learning. This is because they can provide college students with a sea of fundamental knowledge, which may help them lay a solid foundation, allowing them to have better understanding of their major courses, which are derivatives from the primary subjects. For example, it is math that can instruct its learners plenty of equations, with which they are able to gain the results which they want easily. With the help of this essential subject, students can better perceive economics. According to a survey made by Nanjing University in China, most of the Chinese economists choose math as their auxiliary course when they study their majors.
In addition, basic science classes can exert a positive impact on pressure reduction. In general, some of these courses are largely different from their majors, offering distinct experience for the class-takers to accumulate, and thus helping them take their minds off their stressful major study. For example, it is literature that can render readers a virtual world, temporarily keeping them away from the reality and allowing them not to think about what they are learning at college. In contrast, if the undergraduates learn their majors repeatedly day and night, they are more likely to feel tired of their dull routine, which may greatly reduce their study efficiency.
Admittedly, a few people may argue that undergraduates may waste plenty of time if they take basic science classes, which they may have already learned in high school. Besides, paying attention to the basic science classes may occupy a large part of the time that they should spend on the subjects that they are good at.
To conclude, in accordance with what has been discussed above, I strongly maintain that universities had better make the policy that all the students ought to learn basic science subjects.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- Some people think the most important thing about being rich is helping other people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...course when they study their majors. In addition, basic science classes can e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atly reduce their study efficiency. Admittedly, a few people may argue that ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the subjects that they are good at. To conclude, in accordance with what has...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in contrast, in general, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14361702128 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61041264696 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534574468085 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9830625148 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242603309113 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102147706759 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620170498946 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155339111916 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498764179333 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.