Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
"A person should never make an important decision alone."
Decision making is a very important part of one’s life. Life is not a bed of rose. Therefore, different hurdles, ups, and downs come into our life and at that time we may arrive in front of two different paths. Choosing the right path will obviously be very much rewarding and moving towards a wrong path can ruin our life. A good decision in time of higher education or job can change our life forever. We must take suggestions from our elders or those who have already gone for a similar kind of path. It will facilitate us to take good decision. That’s why I believe a person should take help from others before taking an important decision.
We may land into some situations in our life where both the options have some very strong pros. We may face a difficult time to pick one among them. Opinions and suggestions from experienced person come handy at that time. For example, when I passed my higher secondary exam, I had two options to continue my higher education. The first, option was taking admission in a very reputed university where I can continue my study with Agricultural Engineering as a major. Agriculture is one of my favorite subjects and I have a passion for studying agriculture and improving farmer’s income, lifestyle for a long time. On the other hand, I had an option to take admission in a teacher’s training college and continue my studies with Biology as a major. This course provides a better job security in the future as students graduating from this college can easily secure a job as a teacher. I was in a great dilemma at that time. Ultimately, my father encouraged me to go with my passion and now I am highly satisfied with my studies.
Sometimes, if someone is in a very higher managerial or administrative position, he must take several important decisions. These decisions also decide the fate of the whole company and other employees. A wrong decision can ruin everyone’s life. At this point, he must take advice from other board members or some major inputs from other employees. This will slow down the decision-making process and help him to take a more predictable and good decision. For example, some decades ago, jute mills were very famous in my state. It used to produce tons of jute, jute bags and other products. A few years ago, the state government passed a very bad law which was brainchild of one of the minister. This law had a very bad impact on those mills as it was restricting jute production. Many mills were shut down due to heavy loss and many become unemployed. It was obviously a bad decision and government should have taken some time before passing it.
In conclusion, I can say that a good decision always comes from major inputs of other people like our co-worker, fellow students, and elders. We must brainstorm different ideas and take a reasonable amount of time before landing upon an important decision. Though sometime we may have to take a quick decision, we should do some preliminary research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-05 | dmission60 | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Diella | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | de_ranit19 | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | Sanfre011 | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-11 | nuuuuuuu | 60 | view |
- Summarize the points made in lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessels were about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. Th 60
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 88
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76819923372 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76300271905 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484674329502 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9568648484 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.78125 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09375 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137669195748 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414074160366 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632661622445 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091279599034 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021654645839 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.