Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People learn certain things in many ways. Everyone has his own learning pace or learning style. Some people can learn quickly and some may need more time. Some people can learn a thing in very first try or in the very first lesson. Other may need lots of practice and repetitive demonstration. Though the learning ability of everyone is different from each other, I think learning from a higher level person such as a supervisor or teacher is much better.
A teacher has greater experience or skill in his field. They know certain technique that how to teach a new lesson to his student. Moreover, the teacher has already come across this learning phase from his teacher. So, he knows which is the better way of teaching and how one can easily understand certain topics. But a student’s fellow students are also learning first time as him. Therefore, the same level of peers may have not that much experience. For example, there was a Biology teacher in my high school. He had been teaching that subject for twenty years. He used to bring a live frog or some insect in class while teaching about it so that students can see its features practically. Sometimes, he also used to dissect those animals or insects in labs in order to show different organs. He also had working models of different organs like heart, lung which illustrate its function very well. He knows how to facilitate better understanding and most of the students in his class used to get a good grade. A peer may not have this much experience. Sometimes it also happens that a student has not understood one concept correctly and he may end up teaching a wrong concept to his fellow students.
However, in some cases learning from a fellow student may be helpful. One bright student may help his fellow students just before exam or in dorm with some hard concepts as teacher may not be available outside office hours. In certain cases, some teacher complicates a concept and it becomes hard to understand. In this situation, fellow student may become a bliss who can simplify it to layman’s understanding.
In conclusion, I can say that the very first learning must come from a teacher or supervisor as they have in-depth knowledge of a particular subject. Likewise, our parent teaches us the values or first lessons after we born as they have already faced different phases of their life. But, in certain cases, a fellow student or a co-worker can make an already taught concept more clear. We can tell that a teacher helps us to learn a lesson first and then our peers may help us to get a strong grip on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-12 | Ravshan Ganiyev | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Ravshan Ganiyev | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Ravshan Ganiyev | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | de_ranit19 | 70 | view |
| 2017-12-17 | 62668692 | 70 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 77
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- Summarize the points made in lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 73
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to style'
Suggestion: to style
...e has his own learning pace or learning style. Some people can learn quickly and some...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y it to layman's understanding. In conclusion, I can say that the very fir...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...us the values or first lessons after we born as they have already faced different ph...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay help us to get a strong grip on it.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70614035088 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56779049277 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0032797297 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6428571429 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32142857143 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20327301964 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586512043523 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053923780763 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132604794226 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418203813628 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.