Summarize the points made in lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The article states that today’s young generation doesn’t want to read literature like novels, plays, and poems. According to the reading, it is troubling and unfortunate and it provides three reasons of support. But the professors explain that only literature doesn’t promote culture and there are many forms of it.
First, the reading claims that there is a decline in book reading and especially literature. This is very unfortunate as public is missing out many important benefits such as intellectual simulation, imagination and sympathy for others. However, the professor explains that there are many other books on Science, History, Political analysis which are far better than literature. These books also can provide equal intellectual simulation and good imagination to its reader.
Second, the author posits that people are not only avoiding important benefits of literature, they are also spending time on poorly written self-help books, television shows, music, videos etc. According to author, these are intellectually undemanding. But, the professor explains that culture has changed in these days. There are many forms of expressing a good culture. There are plentiful of movies, songs which impose good culture and a person becomes culturally rich if he watches a good movie.
Third, the reading says that as trend of reading literature is going down, it has a negative impact on the authors of literature. Publishers do not want to support the authors any more except very few writers. The professor opposes this point by explaining that there may be some author’s fault for less sale of literature. Many modern literature are very difficult to digest and audience tend to avoid them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?"A person should never make an important decision alone." 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun literature seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much modern literature', 'a good deal of modern literature'.
Suggestion: Much modern literature; A good deal of modern literature
...os;s fault for less sale of literature. Many modern literature are very difficult to digest and audien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44237918216 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85720563692 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4135721687 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846864291164 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277020216186 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370804731706 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510291906747 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274487321522 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.