Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
How to promote the country development is a very hot topic. Especially in developing countries, like China, education is considered to be the most important way to achieve development. Personally, I think the education of university students is more significant than that of very young children.
First, students in universities are at their golden stage when they have the most and best opinions and creativity. They need a wide variety of subjects and activities to help develop their interests and stimulate their talents. For example, mathematics can promote their ability of thinking logically, while art exhibitions can establish their deep understanding about beautiful things, etc. All of these different fields work together to shape a great young generation, which makes the main power of exploring the bright future of a country. Thus, it is necessary for a government to spend enough money on supporting the cultivation of university students.
Second, students in universities can create value for the society immediately after their graduation, whereas the investment in very young children is a very long-term process to get profits. After getting their bachelor degrees, some young people go into various companies and plants to make contributions to their countries. Besides, a lot of them choose to seek for advanced degrees in universities or institutions. Generally, these young scientists invent novel technologies to improve the productivity, as well as explore deep science to help people understand the world, which is so valuable. Therefore, a government has the responsibility to provide them with a large amount of funding to make values.
Granted, the education of very young children is also very significant, which may determine their future development in high schools and even universities. However, I do not think a government has to invest more in them than in universities. After all, university students can volunteer to help these young children in their communities develop their mental and physical health. In this way, these young people at different ages can get the best cultivation.
In conclusion, from the perspectives of developmental stages and the profit from the investment, it is wise to provide more funding for university students than very little children. Futhermore, it can promote the cultivation of not only university students but also those young children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions a 76
- TPO36 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 90
- TPO 46Question:Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to old 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, after all, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11898103019 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.670234804 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234186054978 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792125679387 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621070716204 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142311438339 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327872378541 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.