Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Humankind is a gregarious creature. Being in social interactions and having friends is an extreamly important criteria in determining one's mental state and happiness. A specific individual often make numerous friends in his lifetime but not gets identicaly close to all of them. Almost all of people have some friends that they feel more convinient with them. Although the ability to make lots of new friends is not bad, I beleive that the ability to maintain potential friendships with more valuable friends over long period of time is more important. I will elaborate on my most outstanding reasons in what follows.
Humankind is very complex. It is hard to know a person in short period of time. It may take years to understand someone thoroughly and comply with him\her. All of us have faced the situation in which we think a new person who we just met is perfect. At first we depict a flawless imagination of him in our minds but often this interpretion is not true. But for friends who we know for years, we have spent enormous amount of time to understand them and we know how to treat with them and vice versa. But with new friends it is hard to know how to joke with them or even talk with them in a way that is appropriate.
Passing of the time will make many things clear. A person who may seem lovely and trustable may turn out to be decieving. He may tries to take advantage of us or just wants to spend time with us for our particular advantage for him. But an old friend has proved himslef through passing of the time. In my own experience i met lots of people who i thought they are kind and good people and at the end they turned out to b the opposite.
Finally new friends don't consider the realtionship as valuable as old freinds. Old friends can be reliable in hardships, they often help us in times of trouble but new friends don't necassarily consider the friendship as serious. Hence having old friends is a guarantie for us to be sure that in our lows, there will be someone to take our hand.
To cut the long story short, Old friends are more valuable. We put much time to know them and they know us as well. They are trustable and reliable far more than new friends. In my idea making new friends is a very good ability but only if it doesn't mean to loose old friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 48 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past. 73
- TPO 51 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep rooms their neat and organized are more successful than those who do not. 83
- TPO 52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ps with more valuable friends over long period of time is more important. I will elaborate on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...x. It is hard to know a person in short period of time. It may take years to understand someon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ssing of the time. In my own experience i met lots of people who i thought they a...
^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...own experience i met lots of people who i thought they are kind and good people a...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...d they turned out to b the opposite. Finally new friends dont consider the realtions...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... b the opposite. Finally new friends dont consider the realtionship as valuable a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... us in times of trouble but new friends dont necassarily consider the friendship as ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ily consider the friendship as serious. Hence having old friends is a guarantie for u...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s is a very good ability but only if it doesnt mean to loose old friends.
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...d ability but only if it doesnt mean to loose old friends.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, so, well, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44339622642 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48857750089 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466981132075 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2866389502 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.36 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.96 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290380004232 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797799327827 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825169114385 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167582726085 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809945154595 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 58.1214874552 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.