Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Team project is definitely more propitious for students with respect to their learning in comparison to when they work alone. By working together as a team, students not only broaden their knowledge, but also learn to work with others. Although, some people might refute this claim, I completely support it because of the following reasons.
First and foremost, students learn about the subject better when they work in a team. Different students have varied perspective of pursuing the problem and can come up with contradicting or refined solutions. Rigorous brain storming on the problem with conflicting opinions can help students come up with a more sophisticated solution. For an example, when I was working on a class project, in my university, me and my team mates used to have lots of contentions which I feel helped us a lot in coming with a robust solution for the NP Hard problem which we were working on.
In addition to the benefit of having more in-depth learning, no student stays behind because of continuous knowledge transfer from their peers. Team work ensures that each student learns clearly about the problem and its potential solutions. If one student is weak in studies, his team mates can aid him grapple with the problem. The veracity of this point can be proved by taking an instance of one of the project work from my school, wherein, my friend, Raghav, who used to fail in almost all his subjects, managed to pass in the project work which was done in a team. He was helped by his team members to cope up with his difficulties and learn about the project.
Furthermore, a student also learns to work in a team, communicate with his contemporaries and coordinate with them, in order to finish a task. Such an exercise is crude for anyone to grow in his life. To put a light on this claim, let’s meticulously draw our attention to any corporate work, wherein people have to perform in a big team. Their success will depend on how well they can slog with their peers. Team projects in school can help students to prepare themselves early for such upcoming opportunities.
In summary, working in a team is incumbent for a student, in order for him to learn more and succeed in his life. Thus, I absolutely endorse the idea of students working in a team than working alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they challenge points made in the reading. 3
- For this task, you will read a passage and then listen to a lecture on the same topic. You may take notes while you read and listen. Then, you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship between the reading and the lecture. Th 76
- The cost of converting money from one national currency to another is very high. Moreover, differences in currency value can make market prices unstable, discouraging international trade and travel. A group of countries in Europe has been able to avoid ma 85
- All too often, inventors from the U.S. and European countries are incorrectly credited for creating the modern world. In fact, various nations around the world are truly responsible for many of the innovations that have shaped our lives today.To give one 3
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, i feel, in addition, in summary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78054862843 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66499430358 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511221945137 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.938339939 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.894736842 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291197073112 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114838551888 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762103629838 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205492781305 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519489370297 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.