Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and example
Since the dawn of civilization, group activities have played a pivotal role in people's lives. These activities were in different aspects of life, including hunting or farming, which now turns into more modernized responsibilities like doing projects of companies or class projects. The question which arises here is whether these team activities are helpful for students or no. Some believe that these activities will make them lazy and dependence; However, I contend that they will benefit them to flourish efficiently. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
The first remarkable reason to be mentioned is that team projects have the advantage of saving time. Since the students can break down the projects into chunks and dedicate each chunk to one member, the whole work will be finish sooner, so they can use the rest of their time in other projects and reinforce their set-skills which is necessary for their career opportunity. Taking a personal experience, when I was a college student, I was engaged in a group assignment. As my teammates were so reliable and persistent, we finished our project soon and began other projects. By being in that team, I had the chance to develop lots of skills such as different programming languages which helped me to find my ideal job.
Another equally important point is that by working with peers, students can reap the benefits of socializing and having a healthy mental state. Being alone and not involving in the team will lead to severe depression and high stress levels. These cognitive impairments will affect other parts of students' life, and they will have problems in learning new things. To prevent these problems, teachers should encourage students to work in groups. Moreover, the sense of sociability acquired in their early years of life can be translated into their future jobs, and they actually can finish their projects with flying colors. Well-known entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates, who established Microsoft company, always insist that his secret of success was learning team projects when he was a schooler. By using those skills, he could manage such a successful company which has the highest rank in the world in computer technology.
In conclusion, doing group projects is an indispensable element of learning, and teachers should not ignore that. It is highly recommended that governments make some educational plans in students team ability in order to reach its fruitful result in the future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greaterinfluence on people’s lives than television has. 70
- tpo 41 81
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 70
- TPO 35 Integrated WritingIn 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum 52
- tpo 37 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...that his secret of success was learning team projects when he was a schooler. By usi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16625310174 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76739357576 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585607940447 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1064724022 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.578947368 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210304532091 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608464076361 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416760231669 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121607282511 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400542386362 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.