Do you agree or disagree People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree?
People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group.

In the modern era, most of the tasks in different areas are done by groups rather than individuals. However, the success of a group greatly depends on the individuals' characteristics. Some people in a group always criticize others. While some people believe that such members' presence improves group efficiency, I am of the opinion that criticizing people cannot be a member of a group. I will explain my viewpoint in the following essay.
First and foremost, critical people usually cause resentment and make their groupmates upset. Group members must accept criticisms to improve their performance. But if someone always tries to make negative and sometimes rude comments about them, they would become sad and lose their self-confidence. Critical people who are always nagging about other people make their work environment unfriendly and toxic. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Five years ago, I worked in a company as an accountant with a group. First, I was really pleased with my work condition and salary and also my colleagues. After one year of working there, one of my colleagues retired, and he was replaced with another newcomer accountant. At the beginning of his work, he started to give negative feedback about other members' work. He even judged everything that was none of his business. My old colleagues and I were not happy with this negative energy that he gave to us. I was about to resign because, after some time, I felt that I don’t work well enough. Eventually, I requested our manager to move to another branch of the company to get rid of that unfair judgments and criticisms.
Moreover, members who always try to find others' weak spots can barely concentrate on their own work. These people are usually busy focusing on other members' performance and pointing out what is wrong with their work or behavior. Consequently, they would be easily distracted by the smallest things happening around them and decrease the group's overall performance quality. For instance, when I was working in the aforementioned company, my critical colleague was always seeking a subject to start criticizing. He never tried to enhance his own productivity. Instead, he put all his energy into other people's behavior and manner. This affected all group's efficiency. I remember that one of my colleagues, Sarah, committed a mistake in accounting that was really detrimental to the company's reputation because she was completely distracted by our critical colleague that day. She was fired when it came out that the mistake was made by her. If he had not damaged Sarah's concentration by his meaningless negative comments, Sarah has not been fired after five years working there. So critical persons not only waste their energy but also have a negative influence on others' performance.
In a nutshell, I believe that critical people cannot be a group member because they make the other members feel upset and unvalued and because they allocate most of their concentration on their groupmates' work rather than their own.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2022-09-10	Hoda95	83	view
2022-04-04	hooria am	70	view
2021-05-09	Maziyeh Khavari1390	76	view
2021-05-09	Maziyeh Khavari1390	76	view
2021-04-04	kamyar.sa	70	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user farifari :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...rs. While some people believe that such members presence improves group efficiency, I a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ople are usually busy focusing on other members performance and pointing out what is wr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...y but also have a negative influence on others performance. In a nutshell, I believe ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, for instance, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.106 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83171396861 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1255163098 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276272629719 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793461142503 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960266175264 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215670810384 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680165019671 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.